ࡱ>  { bjbjzz ottttt$PG:(=K WFGGGGGG$bILz%Gt_"=__%Gtt):GS*S*S*_VttFS*_FS*S*RGAD0xBFPG0GBLw"6L<DLtDX__S*_____%G%G#___G____L_________$ ::  ASK PtN "Please type part number (for headers)" \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Restricted distribution IOC-XXVII/3 prov. Pt.3 Paris,  DATE \@ "d MMMM yyyy" 3 July 2013 Original: English  INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO) Twenty-seventh Session of the Assembly Paris, 26 June - 5 July 2013 DRAFT SUMMARY REPORT Part 3 (Agenda items 5.2, 5.3, 5.4.1-5.4.3 & 5.4.5) 5. STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENTS 5.2 OCEAN-RELATED HAZARDS 5.2.1 Regional Tsunami warning Systems 5.2.1.1 Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Pacific Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System MrKen Gledhill (New Zealand), Chairman of the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Pacific Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/PTWS), introduced this item. He reported on the developments of the ICG/PTWS, including the New Enhanced PTWC products for PTWS (IOC/2013/TS/105) and the on-going establishment of a Tsunami Warning System in the South China Sea Region, since the 24th Session of the ICG/PTWS (Beijing, China, 2427 May 2011). In a more prospective approach, MrGledhill identified the challenges facing PTWS development, in particular, on securing enough funding to enable ongoing operational training, particularly as the Enhanced Products are introduced, and while maintaining the current high levels of public tsunami awareness over the long term. Canada stated that the ocean data from seafloor pressure sensors along the length of the Canadian Pacific cabled observatory of Ocean Networks Canada are available for use by the Pacific Tsunami group. Member States expressed overall support to the activities of the ICG/PTWS and welcomed the progress made on Enhanced PTWC Products for PTWS. Ken Gledhill invited Member States to participate at the 25th Session of the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Pacific Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/PTWS-XXV), 911 September 2013, Vladivostok, Russian Federation, to contribute to improving the current experimental Enhanced PTWC Products. The representatives of eight Member States took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Ecuador, Japan and U.S.A. [see decision IOC-XXVII, Dec. 5.2.2 below] 5.2.1.2 Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System On behalf of MrRick Bailey (Australia), Chairman of the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/IOTWS), DrSatheesh Shenoi, Chairperson of the ICG/IOTWS Working Group 2 on Tsunami Detection, Warning and Dissemination introduced this item. He highlighted developments since the 9th session of ICG/IOTWS including the transfer from the Interim Advisory Service (IAS) established in 2005 and operated by the United States of America and Japan to the IOTWS Regional Tsunami Service Providers (RTSPs) of Australia, India and Indonesia, which assumed full operational responsibility for provision of tsunami advisories for the Indian Ocean region on 31 March 2013. In a more prospective approach, DrShenoi identified the challenges facing IOTWS development, in particular noting that the IOTWS is meeting the needs of its Member States, including sustaining the detection network, providing regular training programmes to maintain national capacity as systems and RTSP products are enhanced, and organizing biannual IOTWS Communications Tests and biennial Indian Ocean Wave exercises. The Assembly expressed its support for the Regional Tsunami Service Providers for the IOTWS Australia, India and Indonesia and expressed its gratitude to Japan and the United States of America for having provided the interim tsunami advisory service for the Indian Ocean region since April 2005 via the Japan Meteorological Agency and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center. Australia reported that it had recently signed an agreement with the IOC to fund the Secretariat for the ICG/IOTWS in Perth, Western Australia, for a further two years. India confirmed that it would host a workshop on Standard Operating Procedures and training for National Tsunami Warning Centres in Hyderabad in 2014. DrSatheesh Shenoi acknowledged the Assemblys appreciation of the progress made in the IOTWS. He thanked Australia for its continuing support for the ICG/IOTWS Secretariat in Perth, Western Australia. The representatives of four Member States took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Australia, India, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Japan. [see decision IOC-XXVII, Dec. 5.2.2 below.] 5.2.1.3 Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Tsunami and other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions MsChristavonHillebrandt Andrade, Chairperson of the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions (ICG/CARIBE-EWS), introduced this item. She highlighted the efforts that are being made to strengthen the detection system for CARIBE-EWS, the decision to hold annual tsunami wave exercises and the establishment of the Caribbean Tsunami Information Center. In a more prospective approach, MsvonHillebrandt Andrade outlined the elements that still need to be implemented before CARIBE-EWS can be considered established and operational. These elements are further strengthening of the geophysical and oceanographic monitoring, establishment of a Tsunami Warning Centre in the region, Member States strengthening their warning capabilities including completing hazard assessments, and strengthening public awareness and education. Implementing these elements will require financial resources and multi-disciplinary and multi sectoral collaboration. USA reminded the Member States of its commitment to the Caribbean for its phased approach to the establishment of a tsunami warning centre in the region. All Member States indicated support to the activities of the ICG/CARIBE-EWS. Some recalled that there is still a need to complete the sea level observational network for the Caribbean. MsvonHillebrandtAndrade appreciated and acknowledged the support from Member States to the ICG/CARIBE-EWS and noted that as is the case of other regions of the world, the Caribbean is also affected by other coastal hazards and is building its observational system with a multi-hazard approach. The representatives of five Member States took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: U.S.A. and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republican of). [see decision IOC-XXVII, Dec. 5.2.2 below] 5.2.1.4 Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Tsunami Early Warning and Mitigation System in the North-Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected Seas MrFranois Schindel, Chairman of the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Tsunami Early Warning and Mitigation System in the North-Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected Seas (ICG/NEAMTWS), introduced this item. He reported on the developments of the ICG/NEAMTWS notably the start of the operational activities of three national tsunami warning centres and candidate tsunami watch providers (CENALTFrance; NOAGreece; KOERITurkey), the adoption of the criteria and procedures for the accreditation process of the candidate tsunami watch providers (CTWP), the organization of the NEAMWave12 exercise on 2728 November 2012, and the completion of the first phase of the NEAM Tsunami Information Center (NEAMTIC). In a more prospective approach, MrSchindel highlighted the challenges for NEAMTWS. There is still very low awareness of the public and the authorities on the tsunami risk. The vulnerability of the Mediterranean coast is high, due to numerous infrastructures along the coast line (harbours, marinas and hotel resorts). During the summer, more than one million people use the beaches, several of which are located in seismic zones where tsunami waves can reach the shoreline in less than 15 minutes. In that respect, information on a potential tsunami needs to be disseminated very rapidly. At national and international levels, the success of the system depends on the close cooperation between the national tsunami warning centres and the civil protection agencies. The success of the NEAMTWS also depends on the participation of all countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea and North-eastern Atlantic Ocean, and there are still countries that have not nominated tsunami national contact and tsunami warning focal points. MrSchindel emphasized that the detection networks need to be sustained by national and international funding and stressed that NEAMTWS has to be tested through periodic exercises. Finally, MrSchindel raised the issue of awareness of the public at large but also of the tsunami scientific community of the work done by UNESCO-IOC in the field of tsunami warning systems. MrSchindel suggested that an awareness raising campaign should be organized with the support of UNESCO. Member states congratulated the ICG/NEAMTWS and the Technical Secretariat for the achievements of the last biennium, including the establishment by several nations of their National Tsunami Warning Systems acting as Tsunami Watch Providers. The Assembly noted the value of sharing other ICGs experience and expertise for forecasting modelling and simulation and risk assessment methodologies. Turkey announced that it will host the 26th Symposium of the IUGG Tsunami Commission from 25 to 28 September 2013 (Fethiye-Gcek, Turkey). The symposium is organised by Prof. Yalciner, the Vice-chair of the ICG/NEAMTWS. Portugal announced the creation of a National Tsunami Warning Centre which will be officially set up by the end of 2013. The representatives of four Member States took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Algeria, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. [see decision IOC-XXVII, Dec. 5.2.2 below.] 5.2.2 Global Coordination of Warnings and Mitigation Systems for Ocean Hazards (TOWS-WG) MrYutakaMichida, Chairman of the Working Group on Tsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation Systems (TOWS-WG) introduced this item. He reported on the decisions and recommendations of the 6th meeting of TOWS-WG. In closing he stressed the need for continued inter-ICG cooperation and harmonisation, and underlined the particular importance as the IOTWS and NEAMTWS have transitioned to an operational level of functioning. Member states expressed support for continued inter-ICG coordination through TOWS. The representatives of 18 Member States took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Algeria, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, India, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Italy, Japan, Nigeria, Portugal, Russian Federation, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Turkey, USA and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of). The IOC Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.2.2. The Assembly, Having considered the executive summary reports of the recent sessions of the Intergovernmental Coordination Groups for: the Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/IOTWS-IX); the Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions (ICG/CARIBEEWS-VIII), the North-Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected Seas Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (ICG/NEAMTWS-IX), and the report of the Working Group on Tsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation Systems (TOWS-WG-VI), Accepts the reports and the decisions and recommendations contained therein; Agrees that the regular budget for ICG activities will be considered as part of the overall IOC Programme and Budget resolution XXVII/DR.(6.1, 6.2). Pacific Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (PTWS) Notes the experimental introduction of the Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre (PTWC) Enhanced Products for tsunami threat assessment based on tsunami forecast models and pre-defined coastal zones; Also notes the proposal of establishment of a Sub-Regional Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System for the South China Sea Region and that progress has been made towards this goal. Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (IOTWS) Notes that the Regional Tsunami Service Providers (RTSP) of Australia, India and Indonesia have assumed full operational responsibility for the provision of RTSP Service Level 2 tsunami advisories for the Indian Ocean Area of Responsibility from 31 March 2013; Expresses its deep appreciation to the Governments of Japan and the United States of America for the provision of the Interim Tsunami Advisory Service for the Indian Ocean region by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) and Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre (PTWC) from April 2005 to 31 March 2013. III. Tsunami and Other Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Adjacent Regions (CARIBE-EWS) Notes that the Caribbean Tsunami Information Centre has been established, hosted by the Government of Barbados; Also notes that the ICG/CARIBEEWS has decided to organize annual CARIBEWAVE exercises as from 2014. IV. North-Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected Seas Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (NEAMTWS) Welcomes that the Candidate Tsunami Watch Providers (CTWP) of France, Greece and Turkey as of 1st August 2012 offer to provide tsunami watch services to ICG/NEAMTWS Member States upon request via the IOC; Notes the steady progress of Italy and Portugal in developing their National Tsunami Warning Centres and their intent to also act as Candidate Tsunami Watch Providers and thereby contributing to tsunami monitoring coverage for all geographic areas of NEAMTWS; Expresses appreciation to the European Commission for having contributed to the creation of the Tsunami Information Centre for the North-eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean and connected seas (NEAMTIC); Expresses the urgent need for Member States to secure continued technical secretariat support to the NEAMTWS via extrabudgetary resources or secondments; V. Working Group on Tsunamis and Other Hazards Related to Sea-Level Warning and Mitigation Systems (TOWS-WG) Decides to continue the TOWS-WG for the next intersessional period with the existing terms of reference and membership. 5.3 OBSERVING SYSTEMS, DATA MANAGEMENT 5.3.1 The Future Needs for Intergovernmental Coordination and Governance for Sustained Ocean Observations and Services The IOC Vice-Chairman for Group III, Captain (Ret.) Frederico Antonio Saraiva Nogueira, introduced this item. He recalled that addressing some ocean-related hazards and societal challenges required long-term observations and services including forecasts. The IOC Executive Council at its 45th session (2012) decided to establish an inter-sessional consultation to identify scientific and technical issues within the IOC mission and mandate, in order to improve IOC's activities in the area of sustained ocean observations and services. This consultation was done by questionnaire, with 29 Member State responses received by the secretariat. Additionally, an expert workshop on "The Present Status of Sustained Ocean Observations and Services in Caribbean and Latin America Countries (Group III) (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 68 March 2013), supported by the Republic of Korea and Brazil, provided additional input. The capacities of Member States in sustained ocean observations and services vary widely. Many Member States engage in such activities, largely with a national focus on national users, in many cases government agencies. A common impediment to implementation was a lack of national governmental awareness and understanding of the potential benefits of ocean-related services to respond to national societal and development challenges. Given the established mandates of GOOS, JCOMM and IODE in the global coordination and development of sustained ocean observations and services, MrNogueira invited the Assembly to call on these IOC programmes to review the results of the consultation and incorporate actions to address these findings in their respective work plans. The Assembly thanked MrNogueira for his report, and emphasized the importance of sustained ocean observations, services, and the transformation of ocean data into actionable information in achieving Member State objectives. The Assembly proposed that the consultation could be updated with further Member State responses, and that its extended findings would be an important input to the "Future of IOC" working group (see Agenda Item 5.1). The Assembly noted that all sustained ocean observations and services activities of the IOC should fall under the framework of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The representatives of 13 Member States and IODE took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Brazil, Canada, Japan, Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Thailand. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.3.1. The Assembly, Recalling Decision 4.7 of the IOC Assembly at its 26th session and Decision 4.2 of the IOC Executive Council at its 45th session, Having examined documents IOC/IOC-XXVII/2 Annex 9 & Add. and IOC Workshop Report, 254, Takes note of their findings and recommendations as well as discussion and input provided during the session; Re-emphasizes the role of GOOS, IODE and JCOMM in coordinating sustained ocean observations and services; and Requests GOOS, IODE and JCOMM to consider the findings of this consultation and its possible updates in the future development of their work plans; Encourages Member States to engage in the development of national sustained ocean observational systems and support services and to streamline procedures for their implementation, thereby contributing to the objectives and work plans of GOOS, IODE and JCOMM. 5.3.2 Global Ocean Observing System The co-chair of the IOC-WMO-UNEP-ICSU Global Ocean Observing System Steering Committee (GOOS-SC), DrJohn Gunn, introduced this item. Through Resolution XXVI-8, the Assembly decided that the GOOS-SC "will produce a biennial Work plan for consideration and adoption by the Assembly." It further decided that amongst the membership of the GOOSSC "five experts will be appointed by Member State 'Electoral Groups' during the IOC Assembly, one from each group." Dr Gunn reported on the status of GOOS, its engagement with partners and the scientific community, and the activities of the GOOS Steering Committee and its panels. He recalled that the 26thAssembly in 2011 had decided to orient GOOS around the Framework for Ocean Observing (IOC/INF-1284rev.), including an expansion of GOOS to monitor ocean biology and biogeochemistry in addition to physical variables, serving new scientific and societal challenges. The GOOSSC had met twice since the last Assembly. DrGunn expressed gratitude to China for hosting the 2nd GOOSSC Meeting (2527 March 2013, Qingdao), and outlined its outcomes, including the proposed GOOS Work Plan for 20142015 (GOOS-199 Annex 1). The GOOSSC expressed particular concern at the human and financial resources available to support the GOOS Work Plan. IOC funding can, in a best case scenario, only supports about 50% of the proposed costed Work Plan. The GOOSSC gave priority to sustaining the activities in global climate observations through the Physics Panel, and decided that biogeochemical and biology/ecosystems activities will not progress until the required funding is secured. Fundraising is an important goal of the GOOSSC. DrGunn additionally reported on the outcomes of the Sixth GOOS Regional Forum (1416 May 2013, Hawaii, USA) and proposed a revision of the GOOS Regional Policy to reflect the revised GOOS structures. The revised Policy ensures that the GOOS Regional Alliances (GRAs) become a key implementation arm of GOOS, along with national observing systems. The GRAs have assessed their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. GOOS and the IOC should prioritize capacity development for ocean observations in order to achieve their objectives. GOOS has worked closely with IODE and JCOMM in accomplishing its objectives. The Assembly thanked DrGunn for his presentation of the progress of the GOOSSC. It identified GOOS as a key IOC programme, and welcomed its expansion into biogeochemical and biological/ecosystems observations. China stated that it would consider setting up a GOOS Support Office, hosted by the State Oceanic Administration (SOA), to strengthen co-ordination of GOOS and JCOMM in the future. Responding to a statement from Turkey, the Secretariat urged all Member States deploying Argo profiling floats to comply with relevant IOC resolutions for notification of coastal Member States. The representatives of 15 Member States took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Belgium, China, India, Japan and USA. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.3.2. The Assembly, Global Ocean Observing System Work Plan Having examined the executive summary report of the Second Meeting of the Global Ocean Observing System Steering Committee (March 2013, GOOS-199), Agrees to the GOOS Work Plan for 20142015 (GOOS-199 Annex 1); Notes the financial and human resource implications of the work plan and the shortfall against the draft IOC Programme and Budget allocation for GOOS (GOOS-199 Annex 2), exacerbated by the financial situation of the IOC; Further notes the priority decided by the GOOS SC, to shelve plans for the GOOS Biogeochemistry and GOOS Biology and Ecosystems panels and observing system components until such time as adequate resources are identified; Agrees to consider the GOOS programme and budget as part of the overall IOC Programme and Budget resolution XXVII/DR.(6.1, 6.2), and Urges Member States to support the GOOS Work Plan through cash contributions to the IOC Special Account for GOOS, secondments of staff members to the GOOS Project Office, in kind support such as hosting meetings or workshops with participant funding, the establishment of GOOS support offices, the funding of GOOS Projects, or other means as agreed by the GOOS SC. GOOS Regional Policy Noting the inconsistency between the GOOS Regional Policy (2006) and the reform of GOOS structures in 2011, and having additionally examined the proposed GOOS Regional Policy 2013 (IOC/INF-1308), Recalling Resolution XXVI-1 on Strengthening IOC regional Subsidiary and the IOC Regional Strategy for Organizational Improvement, Adopts the GOOS Regional Policy 2013; and Recognizes the Mediterranean Operational Network for the Global Ocean Observing System (MONGOOS) as a GOOS Regional Alliance, as a merger of the former Mediterranean GOOS Regional Alliance and the EuroGOOS Mediterranean Operational Oceanography Network. GOOS SC Regional Membership Recalling the GOOS SC regional membership appointment defined in IOC Resolution XXVI-8, and further recalling  HYPERLINK "http://www.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=10401" IOC Circular Letter, 2476 requesting nominations of experts for appointment by Member State Electoral Groups, Notes the appointment by each of the Member State Electoral Groups of a regional expert member of the GOOS SC for 20142015: Margarita GREGG, United States of America (Group I) Alexander POSTNOV, Russian Federation (Group II) Miriam Azucena LUCERO MUOZ, Ecuador (Group III) LIN Shaohua, China (Group IV) Ashley JOHNSON, South Africa (Group V). 5.3.3 Joint IOC-WMO Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (JCOMM) The Co-President of the Joint IOC-WMO Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (JCOMM), MsNadia Pinardi, introduced this item. JCOMM is a Primary Subsidiary Body of the IOC Assembly and reports under IOC Rule of Procedure 48.3. DrPinardi introduced elements of the JCOMM Strategy 20122016, whose Executive Summary was approved at JCOMM-4 (2831 May 2012, Yeosu, Republic of Korea), and is under review and revision by the JCOMM Co-Presidents and Management Committee; as well a synthesis of the JCOMM Operating Plan 20132016 developed by the Management Committee and Secretariats. The Operating Plan is aligned with the adopted JCOMM 20122016 work plan, the Programme and Budget of IOC and the Operating Plan of WMO, and notably details activities and their required and identified financial resources. DrPinardi also introduced the common objectives between the JCOMM Strategy and the draft IOC Medium-Term Strategy for 20142021. The Assembly appreciated the report of Dr Pinardi and provided guidance to the work of JCOMM. The representatives of eight Member States and the WMO took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: China and Germany. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.3.3. Joint IOC-WMO Technical Commission (JCOMM) for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology Operating Plan (20132016) The Assembly, Having examined JCOMM and the IOC Medium-Term Strategy 20142021: a synthesis of common objectives (IOC/INF-1307), Provides guidance on JCOMM's activities as follows: Continue important work in coordination of services, data management, and observation programmes, Maintain strong cooperation with IODE, in particular on the development of the Marine Climate Data System, Consider deepening cooperation with GOOS Regional Alliances in coastal observations and for regional seas, Consider expanding present Capacity Development activities, clearly linked to societal needs; Notes the financial implications of the JCOMM Operating Plan for IOC and WMO, and Agrees to consider an overall JCOMM programme and budget as a part of the IOC Programme and Budget resolution IOC-XXVII/DR.(3.2, 6.1, 6.2). 5.3.4 IOC Committee on International Oceanographic Data and Information Exchange (IODE) The IODE Co-Chairman, MrAriel Troisi, introduced this item. IODE is the oldest Primary Subsidiary Body of the IOC Assembly and reports under IOC Rule of Procedure 48.3. MrTroisi provided a brief overview of the outcome of the 22nd Session of the IOC Committee on International Oceanographic Data and Information Exchange (IODE) held in Ensenada, Mexico on 1115 March 2013. The Session adopted 20 recommendations that provided a clear path to IODEs restructuring and re-organization. The key recommendations established a joint IAMSLIC-IODE group of experts on marine information management, an ocean data standards and best practices project and associated clearing house for data/information management practices, the IODE Associate Data Unit and IODE Global Data Assembly Centres as new structural elements, the IODE Quality Management Framework, and also revised the IODE objectives. The Committee adopted a work plan and budget that, taking into account the UNESCO financial crisis, would be based mainly on income from extra-budgetary sources. The proposed work plan was examined by the Financial Committee. MrTroisi also recalled discussions at IODE-XXII on the continued need for IODE and invited the Assembly to consider the same question. MrTroisi reported on the decision of the Committee to adopt a revised IOC Strategic Plan for Oceanographic Data and Information Exchange (20132016) and to submit it to the Assembly for endorsement. The Chair, MrSang-Kyung Byun, presented an IOC Certificate of Appreciation to Sydney Levitus (represented by MrCraigMcLean, Head of Delegation of the United States of America) for his outstanding contribution to the scientific and ocean data management communities. Belgium (Governement of Flanders) informed the Assembly that the agreement for the hosting of the IOC Project Office for IODE had been renewed until 31 December 2016. Additional funding would be made available to IOC and its IODE through the Flanders-UNESCO Trust Fund for Science (FUST). The Russian Federation announced that the Partnership for the IODE Ocean Data Portal (Obninsk) would be officially inaugurated on 10 September 2013. Canada added that MrTobias Spears had been designated as Ocean Data Portal Project Manager as an in-kind contribution to IODE as from May 2013. India informed the Assembly that the ITCOOcean facility in Hyderabad would work closely with the OceanTeacher Academy in organizing training activities, recalling the successful testing of video-conferencing based multi-site teaching in March 2012. The Assembly re-iterated the importance of IODE as a key programme of the Commission which cuts across and provides services and products to all IOC programmes. The Assembly expressed its appreciation to the Government of Flanders (Belgium), India, Russian Federation, Mexico and Canada for their direct support to IODE, and to all IOC Member States for their in-kind support through their National Oceanographic Data Centres (NODCs) and through sponsoring national experts in IODE meetings and activities. The Assembly, while recognizing the current financial crisis, urged the continuation or revitalization of the Ocean Data and Information Networks (ODINs) in all regions, referring to the success of the well-funded ODINAFRICA. The Assembly expressed great appreciation for the important decisions taken at IODE-XXII and in particular on the restructuring of IODE and the adoption of a Quality Management Framework. The Assembly further welcomed the considerable increase in cooperation between IODE and other organizations such as ICSU/WDS, SCOR, JCOMM, etc. The Assembly further stressed the importance of the OceanTeacher project that ensured that all Member States could acquire the necessary skills in not only ocean data and information management, but increasingly also in other areas of IOCs mandate. The representatives of 23 Member States took the floor. The following Member States chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Mozambique, Turkey and U.K. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec. 5.3.4. The Assembly, Having examined the Executive Summary and Report of the 22nd Session of the IOC Committee on International Oceanographic Data and Information Exchange (IODE-XXII) (1115 March 2013, Ensenada, Mexico), the recommendations and the decision contained therein (IOC/IODE-XXII/3s); Decides to take action in accordance with the Recommendations adopted by IODE-XXII; Endorses the IOC Strategic Plan for Oceanographic Data and Information Management 2013-2016 as given in annex to the report of IODE-XXII (IOC/IODE-XXII/3s); Agrees that the Plan should be: published and distributed widely and used as a basic data strategy throughout the Programmes and Projects of the IOC; and regularly reviewed and revised by the IODE Committee, in close consultation with all IOC programmes; Notes the financial and human resource implications of the work plan and the shortfall against the draft IOC Programme and Budget allocation for IODE, especially for regional activities and OBIS, exacerbated by the financial situation of the IOC; Agrees to the IODE Work Plan for 20132015 (Recommendation IODE-XXII.20) and to consider it in the overall IOC Programme and Budget Resolution XXVII/DR.(6.1,6.2); Expresses its deep appreciation to the Government of Flanders (Belgium) for hosting and supporting the IOC Project Office for IODE and for its continuing and increasing financial support to IODE, the Russian Federation for its support through the hosting of the Partnership Centre for the IODE Ocean Data Portal in Obninsk, as well as to other donors and Member States who are providing financial and in-kind support for IODE; Expresses its appreciation for the in-kind support for the IODE Programme provided by Member States through establishing and maintaining IODE Data Centres, provision of experts, through the provision of valuable ocean data and information products and services, and through financial and in-kind contributions to IOC; Urges Member States to support the IODE Work Plan through cash contributions to the IOC Special Accounts for IODE and OBIS, secondments of staff members to the IODE Project Office, in-kind support such as hosting meetings or workshops with participant funding, the establishment of IODE partnership centres or OceanTeacher Regional Training Centres, or the funding of IODE or OBIS Projects or the establishment of NODCs. 5.3.4.1 Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) The Executive Secretary, introduced this item. She informed the Assembly on the importance of OBIS in IOC, the visibility OBIS gives to IOC and the important scientific and international recognition of OBIS. The adoption of OBIS into IODE (IOC Resolution XXV-4) brought stewardship responsibilities to IOC Member States for the worlds only global, standardized marine biogeographic data system. However, IOC has not yet been able to find a sustainable funding situation for OBIS beyond 2014, and it now risks losing its world leading position in coordinating the network of marine biodiversity science projects, programmes and institutions. IOC and its IODE risk losing credibility with the scientific community. Losing OBIS will have an immediate impact on IOC, the OBIS network and the Member States, but the long-term effects will be much larger. The Assembly expressed its appreciation to the OBIS Secretariat for the significant achievements so far and stressed the importance of OBIS as a priority and flagship project of the Commission, serving all IOC programmes. The Assembly recognized that OBIS is the world's largest database on marine biodiversity and is needed for global reporting on the state of our ocean, such as the UN World Ocean Assessment, and is key for setting standards and best practices in marine biodiversity data management and data exchange. The Assembly recognized that it cannot afford to lose one of its most important activities and urged all Member States to support OBIS. The Assembly also noted the need for a regular programme position for OBIS as currently proposed under IOCs draft budget. Belgium, USA, Brazil, Canada, Ukraine, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, France and United Kingdom expressed their willingness to assist in finding a solution to ensure the continuation of OBIS under IOC China offered to host a mirror of the OBIS infrastructure. Canada offered to further investigate possibilities for direct funding for OBIS. India is hosting a national OBIS node, a mirror site of the OBIS database and contributes indirectly by providing man power. India wishes to contribute further in providing support for developing dissemination and visualization tools. The Assembly expressed its appreciation to the Government of Flanders (Belgium) for hosting the OBIS Secretariat, as well as to India, the United States and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela for their in-kind support to core activities of OBIS, and to all Member States who continued supporting their national and regional OBIS nodes. The representatives of 13 Member States and the Joint Programming Initiative for Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans (JPI-Oceans) took the floor. The following Member States and JPI-Oceans chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Belgium, India, Tanzania and USA. The Assembly adopted decision IOC-XXVII, Dec. 5.3.4.1. The Assembly, Recalling its decision to accept the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) within the IODE Programme, through Resolution XXV-4, Recognizing OBIS plays a key role to address the increasing need for more, and accurate, time-series data on marine biodiversity to monitor the state of the marine environment and to better understand the ecosystem processes and potential impacts of climate change, in order to more effectively manage our marine living resources, Recalling that the 193 Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Decision COP10/29,10&35) requested Member States to further enhance globally networked scientific efforts, such as OBIS, to continue to update a comprehensive and accessible global database of all forms of life in the sea, and further assess and map the distribution and abundance of species in the sea, and called upon IOC/OBIS to facilitate availability and inter-operability of the best available marine and coastal biodiversity data sets and information across global, regional and national scales, Having considered the report of OBIS (IOC/INF-1312) and the contribution of OBIS to all three Expected Results 6, 7 and 8 in the IOC Draft Programme and Budget for 20142017 (IOC-XXVII/2 Annex 4), Recalls Resolution XXV-4, requesting the Executive Secretary of IOC to request to the Director General of UNESCO to create a full time post for OBIS; Expresses its appreciation to Belgium, USA, India, and Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela for their in-kind support to technical developments of OBIS; Agrees that the regular budget for these activities will be considered as part of the overall IOC Programme and Budget resolution XXVII/DR.(6.1, 6.2); Agrees further that without direct funding from UNESCOs regular programme, Member States will need to take up responsibility to enable the IOC to fulfil the commitment it made to the continuation and further development of OBIS; Urges Member States to provide cash contributions to the IOC Special Account for OBIS, to continue the two OBIS professional staff positions at the IODE Project Office, secondments to the IODE Project Office earmarked for OBIS, in-kind support such as hosting meetings or workshops with participant funding, or other means as agreed by the SG-OBIS. 5.3.5 WMO-ICSU-IOC-UNEP Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) The Director of the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Secretariat, DrCarolin Richter, introduced this item. GCOS was established in 1992 and is sponsored by the WMO, IOC, UNEP and ICSU. GCOS is an internationally-coordinated network of observing systems, for atmosphere, ocean (led by the joint GCOS-GOOS-WCRP Ocean Observations Panel for Climate, OOPC) and terrestrial domains and a programme of activities that support and improve the networks. The OOPC secretariat is now hosted by GCOS in Geneva at the WMO. DrRichter emphasised that for a strong Global Climate Observing System, GCOS needs a strong Global Ocean Observing System. DrRichter presented the GCOS Work Plan 20132016, including the next steps of the GCOS improvement and assessment cycle. The outcomes of a programmatic and observing system review and assessment of GCOS will be reported at the next IOC Assembly. Dr Richter highlighted the link to the Global Framework for Climate Services and hence the need for GOOS to deliver into this mechanism, which will be delivered through the Ocean Observations Panel for Climate (OOPC). The Assembly appreciated the flexibility of the GCOS secretariat to support the on-going activities of IOC. The representatives of two Member States took the floor. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.3.5. The Assembly, Recalling the 1998 Memorandum of Understanding between WMO, IOC, UNEP and ICSU on the Global Climate Observing System, Having considered the Information Document on GCOS planning and implementation (IOC/INF-1309), Taking note of the transfer of the secretariat of the GCOS-GOOS-WCRP Ocean Observations Panel for Climate from the GOOS Project Office at IOC to the GCOS Secretariat at WMO, and of the on-going role of the Ocean Observations Panel for Climate (OOPC) in support of the GOOS Steering Committee and the GOOS Work Plan for 20142015, Provides guidance on the work programme of GCOS as follows: Welcomes the growing focus of GCOS on all timescales of required climate observations, Proposes strategic focus on all observation coordination mechanisms including JCOMM and WIGOS, Proposes looking at observing requirements from the IPCC 5th Assessment Report being published in 2013 and 2014, and Encourages broadening of the contact list for the GCOS review questionnaire to all bodies of the IOC including IODE; Urges Member States to support the execution of this plan by making financial contributions to the IOC Special Account in support of GCOS. 5.4 OCEAN SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 5.4.1 WMO-IOC-ICSU-UNEP World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) DrVladimir Ryabinin, on behalf of the Director of the World Climate Research Programme, DrGhassem Asrar, reported recent progress achieved by the WCRP to improve knowledge and understanding of global and regional climate variability and change, and to develop improved numerical models and climate projections, with particular emphasis on the priorities of IOC Member States. WCRP priorities are based on guidance by Sponsors, taking ocean research priorities as conveyed by IOC. WCRP defined its strategy in 2005, reviewed it in 2008, and in 2009 initiated an implementation plan for the period 20102015. WCRP's on-going work coordinating research and climate projections will have increased focus on the decadal and regional scale. Among numerous interactions with the IOC, analysis, assessment and prediction of sea-level variability and change, especially at the regional level, are a key focus for WCRP and an area of active cooperation with IOC. Among other achievements since 2011, WCRP has implemented the Grand Science Challenges by involving a broad and yet expanding oceanographic research community that has facilitated strong capacity development, education and outreach activities. WCRP action contributes to the IOC High-level Objectives, to the UNESCO Intersectoral Platform on Climate Change, and to the individual national objectives of IOC Member States as they develop climate research, mitigation, and adaptation strategies. WCRP reaffirmed its unconditional commitment to actively and ably support IOC and UNESCO fulfilling their missions with respect to climate, while expressing concern about the proposed reduction in IOC's financial contribution to WCRP. The Assembly noted that activities undertaken by the WCRP are very important for the IOC and the UNESCO work agenda, especially WCRPs recent emphasis on regional scientific activities in developing countries, and science to protect lives and property. Brazil confirmed their commitment to host the 3rd International Symposium on Effects of climate change on the worlds oceans in Santos, in the spring of 2015, organized by the University of So Paulo along with IOC, PICES and ICES. DrRyabinin reiterated that WCRP is committed to serve IOC Member Countries, as a science supporting organization with an increasing emphasis on regional scale climate information and modelling. Within this framework he noted the WCRP Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) which will focus on regional systems, including Africa, and the development of a new generation of prediction systems. The representatives of six Member States, PICES and WMO took the floor. The following Member States and PICES chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: China and USA. The Assembly adopted decision IOC-XXVII, Dec. 5.4.1. The Assembly, Recalling that IOC joined WMO and ICSU as sponsors of the WCRP in 1993, Recalling further that the Assembly and Executive Council, since 2005, have reaffirmed continued co-sponsorship at a level of US$125,000 per annum on its regular Budget and support to the WCRP, identified as a high priority by the Assembly at its 26th session, Taking note of the current financial difficulties of UNESCO during the biennium 20122013 that resulted in a reduced financial contribution to WCRP, Having considered the report of WCRP (IOC/INF-1298), Provides guidance on the work programme of the WCRP as follows: Welcomes work on global and regional sea level, including impact on extremes, the intersection with human vulnerability and adaptation, and the WCRP contribution to IOC High Level Objectives, Welcomes focus on engaging early career scientists, particularly in developing countries, and other Capacity Building activities as recommended in the WCRP Implementation Plan (2009), Welcomes contribution to IPCC Working Group 1 report, including CMIP archive of climate projections, Requests maintenance of WCRPs strong cooperation with IOC, in particular on the development of the Global Framework for Climate Services, Requests additional emphasis on regional climate information, Agrees that the regular budget for these activities will be considered as part of the overall IOC Programme and Budget resolution XXVII/DR.(6.1, 6.2); Urges Member States to support the execution of this plan through the participation of their scientists as well as financial contributions to the IOC Special Trust-Fund for the WCRP. 5.4.2 Intergovernmental panel on Harmful Algal Blooms (IPHAB) The Chair of the IOC Intergovernmental Panel on Harmful Algal Blooms (IPHAB), DrRobert E. Magnien (USA), introduced this item and presented the report, work plan, decisions and recommendations of the Eleventh Session of the IOC Intergovernmental Panel on Harmful Algal Blooms Paris, 2830 April 2013. The IPHAB Chair emphasized the decisions and recommendations made regarding an international strategy for international cooperative research on HABs in a changing world: A New Global Approach to HAB Research to Meet Societal Needs; the development of a Global HAB Status Report; capacity building; a focussed effort to address Ciguatera, and the regional development of the Programme. The IPHAB Chair requested the assistance of the Assembly in ensuring participation in IPHAB of the Member States not already members and recognition in the appropriate national agencies and institutions of IPHAB. The IPHAB Chair urged the IOC Member States to carefully match the HAB Programme Work Plan with national priorities and potential funding in order to actively interact with and support its implementation. The Assembly reiterated the widespread and permanent impacts of HAB events on fisheries, aquaculture, human health, and tourism. The Assembly confirmed the importance of shared efforts and cooperation in both HAB research and management practises. The Assembly underlined the importance of coordination between global and regional IOC HAB Programme activities to avoid duplication, enhance synergies and economise resources. The Assembly welcomed the development of a regular Global HAB Status Report and saw it as complimentary to the World Ocean Assessment. Furthermore, the development of GEOHAB into a research agenda for the coming decade entitled GlobalHAB was welcomed including a strong focus on Ciguatera jointly with WHO and FAO. The Assembly noted the long-term capacity building efforts of the IOC HAB Programme, particularly those for African Member States. The initiative on HABs and desalination was commended. The Assembly expressed its appreciation to Denmark for its longstanding commitment to hosting the IOC Science and Communication Centre on Harmful Algae and to Japan for its longstanding support to WESTPAC-HAB. Denmark confirmed its commitment to do all it can to continue to host the Centre. The representatives of 15 Member States and PICES took the floor. The following Member States and Organization chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Republic of Korea, Thailand, USA and PICES. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.4.2. The Assembly, Recalling IOC Resolution XVI-4, which established the Intergovernmental Panel on Harmful Algal Blooms, Having considered the Executive Summary Report of the 11th Session of the IOC Intergovernmental Panel on Harmful Algal Blooms (IPHAB), its seven Decisions and four Recommendations and the Work Plan for 20142015 adopted at the Session (IOC/IPHAB-XI/3s), Taking into consideration the preoccupying impact of HAB on public health, food security, the development of tourism and a substantial proportion of economic activities in the world, Recognizing that regional, national, and institutional requirements for management of HAB impacts, along with the IOC High Level Objectives, that drive IOC HAB Programme research and capacity development activities, have proven highly valuable to Member States over almost two decades; that the IOC fulfils a unique role in coordinating and implementing international and regional cooperation on HAB research, management and capacity development; and that the need for this continued coordination and regional cooperation can be expected to remain at the same level or increase, Noting with satisfaction that IPHAB has continued to provide a strong and efficient mechanism to respond to new HAB-related problems experienced by Member States and to leverage resources from diverse sources to focus on priority needs, Takes note of the Executive Summary Report of IPHAB-XI and the recommendations contained therein (IOC/IPHAB-XI/3s); Notes that the IOC will help protect human health, economic interests and natural resources through its expanded focus on Ciguatera in cooperation with the WHO and FAO and by coordinating research needed by Member States through the Global HAB Programme; Notes further that the development of a Global HAB Status Report is complementary to the World Ocean Assessment to provide for the first time a picture of the global distribution of HABs, their threats and relationships to nutrient enrichment and other causes; Requests the IOC Executive Secretary to convene the 12th Session of the Panel prior to the 28th Session of the Assembly; Invites SCOR to co-sponsor the Scientific Steering Committee for Global HAB and encourages active joint participation in the development and implementation of the science agenda; Agrees that the regular budget for these activities will be considered as part of the overall IOC Programme and Budget resolution XXVII/DR.(6.1, 6.2); Expresses its appreciation to the Government of Denmark for hosting and supporting the IOC Science and Communication Centre on Harmful Algae, as well as to other donors and Member States who are providing financial and in-kind support for the HAB Programme; Urges funding agencies and institutions in IOC Member States to assist in the mobilization of funding that will ensure the implementation of the IPHAB Work Plan. 5.4.3 Nutrient Pollution IOC Programme Specialist, MrHenrikEnevoldsen, introduced the IOC contribution to Nutrients and Coastal Impacts Research Programme (N-CIRP), as an integrative programme linking IOC and other international programmes. The N-CIRP Plan includes not only coastal marine ecosystem effects, but also other issues such as climate interactions with coastal nutrient loading and effects, consequences of ecosystem changes for tourism, and elements such as institutions and governance, and cross-cutting issues such as climate change impacts. MrEnevoldsen informed also about the joint UNEP-IOC GEF Project Global foundations for reducing nutrient enrichment and oxygen depletion from land-based pollution, in support of Global Nutrient Cycle which was launched late 2011 and has a science component designed to support the N-CIRP work plan, with a focus on global relationships between nutrient loading of coastal marine ecosystems. Due to interpretation time constrains the IOC Chair invited the Member States to go immediately to consider the decision. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.4.3. The Assembly, Recalling Resolution XXV-9 and Assembly decision IOC-XXVI, Dec.7.5, Recognizing the successful funding by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), and the on-going implementation, of the Project Global foundations for reducing nutrient enrichment and oxygen depletion from land based pollution, in support of Global Nutrient Cycle, Notes that the Nutrients and Coastal Impacts Research Programme (N-CIRP) plan to a large degree is being implemented via the GEF Global Foundations project and that N-CIRP provides the programmatic framework for the GEF Global Foundations project despite that the budget situation has not allowed to establish and operate the N-CIRP Steering Committee as foreseen, Endorses the revised programme outline as an integrating activity of the IOC Ocean Sciences programmes; Taking note of the current financial difficulties of UNESCO during the biennium 20122013 and the fact that the proposed level of IOC contribution of US$90,000 for 20142015 under the fully-funded Draft 37C/5 (US$653M scenario) to cover committed co-funding of GEF Global Foundations project will not be possible should there be a reduction in the overall IOC allocation; Decides to maintain the N-CIRP programme as a focus and framework for the GEF Global Foundations project with the understanding that its full implementation will be conditional on the IOCs ability to secure the necessary co-financing level; Invites and encourages IOC Member States to assist in the identification of funding that will ensure the availability of the IOC co-funding of the GEF Global Foundations Project and the activation of N-CIRP Steering Committee. 5.4.4 Integrated Coastal Area Management (ICAM) [under Part 4] 5.4.5 A Regular Process for Global reporting and assessment of the state of the Marine Environment, including Socio-economic Aspects (UN Regular Process) World Ocean Assessment The Coordinator of the UN Group of Experts of the Regular Process, MrAlan Simcock, provided an overview on the of the main developments that have taken place in the implementation of the Regular Process, including the organization of a cycle of Regional Workshops, progress in the establishment of the Regular Process Pool of Experts that will support the preparation of the World Ocean Assessment (WOA). He invited IOC Member States to support the work of the Group of Experts, specifically by: (i) identifying additional experts to be nominated to the Pool of Experts; (ii) providing resources for the organisation of meetings of the Group of Experts and Contributors; (iii) providing information and data through IOC programmes as well as technical comments on the chapters to be developed. MrJ.Barbire, IOC Secretariat, also provided information on IOCs contribution to the work of the Group of Experts (GoE) as described in IOC/INF-1301. He highlighted the involvement of IOC in all UN regional workshops that were organised from 2011 to 2013, as well as the Commission participation at the Group of Experts and Ad Hoc Working Group meetings in 2012 and 2013. A list of resources (such as assessment and data products, marine indicators) that can be made available in support of the WOA, including through the GEF Transboundary Waters Assessment Programme, have been identified by IOC. Numerous proposals on Capacity development were also put forward by IOC at the recent Ad Hoc Working Group Meeting (April 2013). The Assembly expressed wide support for the role played by the Commission in providing scientific and technical support to the UN Regular Process. The Assembly stressed the need for Member States to continue nominating national experts to the Pool of Experts in order to reach an appropriate level of engagement from the scientific community in support of the WOA activities. The Assembly emphasized the essential need to strengthen the capacity of nations in conducting integrated marine assessments, and stressed that IOC, including through its regional subsidiary bodies, was in a prime position to lead WOA capacity development activities, in cooperation with other relevant UN agencies and scientific bodies. The Chairperson of WESTPAC informed the Assembly that a 1st Regional WOA Capacity Building Workshop was organised together with UNEP and APN in Bangkok, Thailand on 1719 September 2012. WESTPAC will continue to build its Member States capacity by mobilizing funding in support of regional expert workshops and the development of integrated marine assessment tools with other relevant regional partners. China stated its intention to support capacity development activities, through the IOC, in support of the WOA, including through the potential establishment of a dedicated training centre. Brazil and India informed the Assembly of their intention to organise UN Regular Process regional workshops, respectively for the South Atlantic, and Northern Indian Ocean regions (December 2013, Chennai, India). Some Member States recognised the relevance of the TWA Programme, in terms of providing baseline indicators to the WOA process, and stressed the need for the WOA to build on existing global and regional assessments such as the IPCC and the assessments conducted in the framework of the Arctic Council. The representatives of 15 Member States took the floor as well as the representatives of WESTPAC and PICES. The following Member States and PICES chose to provide records of their plenary intervention on this agenda item for the informational annex to the meeting report: Canada, India, Thailand and UK. The Assembly adopted Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.4.5. The Assembly, Having considered document IOC/INF-1301, Requests the Executive Secretary to continue: to provide technical and scientific support to the Regular Process in accordance with UNGA resolution 67/78, to dialogue with the Bureau of the Ad Hoc Working Group, the secretariat of the Regular Process (DOALOS) and other competent United Nations programmes and specialized agencies regarding the provision of technical and scientific support to the Regular Process; Agrees that the regular budget for these activities will be considered as part of the overall IOC Programme and Budget resolution XXVII/DR.(6.1, 6.2); Invites IOC Member States to support IOCs role and contributions in this respect.     IOC-XXVII/3 prov. Pt.3 page  PAGE 6 IOC-XXVII/3 prov. Pt.3 page  PAGE 5 IOC-XXVII/3 prov. Pt.3 ABCD]^_fghtuvw~úyjZNZ?ZyhyYzOJQJmHnHsH uhgTOJQJmH sH jhgTOJQJUmH sH hn*hgTOJQJmH sH hn*h0uOJQJmH sH hn*h0u5OJQJmH sH hn*hIq5OJQJmH sH hn*5OJQJh0u5OJQJh5OJQJhF5OJQJhY 5OJQJ*jhOJQJUmHnHsH tH uh0uOJQJjh0uOJQJUE]_w$a$$@&a$Ekd$$Ifl0#< 4 la  9r $If$If 9r    ; E Z ] b c e f r s t y ָ֏{qgWHh_,hOJQJ^JaJh_,h:g5OJQJ^JaJh~CJOJQJhCJOJQJhn*CJOJQJhIqCJOJQJh0uCJOJQJhn*5CJ OJQJh0u5CJ OJQJh0u5OJQJh0u5CJ(OJQJhFOJQJhF5CJOJQJh0uOJQJh0u5CJOJQJh5CJOJQJhf)5CJOJQJ < = > ? @ A B C D E Z [ \ ] d e f $@&a$$a$ W  b , 4n & F dgd d1$7$8$H$`gd9[ & F dgd9[ & F .d^.`gd5 1$7$8$H$^`gdJ,a 1$7$8$H$gd^c V W { ~       b 34viZJh_,h46OJQJ^JaJh9[h4OJQJ^JaJh^cOJQJ]^JaJ"h9[h9[H*OJQJ]^JaJ'h7hOJQJ]^JaJmH sH h9[h9[OJQJ]^JaJ'h9[h9[OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h9[h9[OJQJ]^JaJsHh6OJQJ^JaJh_,h6OJQJ^JaJh_,h5OJQJ^JaJ@n_`jknoٱ١١wi[I5I5'h_,hy`OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h_,hy`OJQJ]^JaJsHh_,h46OJQJ^Jh_,h6OJQJ^Jhg6OJQJ^Jh_,hG6OJQJ^JaJh_,h/OJQJ^JaJh_,h/OJQJ]^JaJ&h_,h/H*OJQJ]^JaJsH'h_,h/OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h_,h/OJQJ]^JaJsH'h_,h/OJQJ]^JaJmH sH _`l !"##x 71$7$8$G$H$^`gdJ,a dh1$7$8$H$`gdy` & F dgd9[ & F dgd 7S1$7$8$G$H$^S`gdy` 1$7$8$H$^`gdJ,a d`gd/ oio@D kl !!!#######d(ɼɼɼɼɼɝɝuju_Oh_,hJ,aOJQJ]^JaJh6OJQJ^Jh^c6OJQJ^Jh_,h6OJQJ^Jh_,h/6OJQJ^JhOJQJ^JaJh_,hy`OJQJ^JaJh_,hOJQJ]^JaJhOJQJ]^JaJh_,hy`OJQJ]^JaJ'h_,hy`OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h_,hy`OJQJ]^JaJsH###&, ..d/]0000224~ 7S1$7$8$G$H$^S`gd^c dgd dhgd*3 & F dgd9[ & F dgdCS.$ 71$7$8$G$H$^`a$gdCS. 7S1$7$8$G$H$^S`gdd(h(6.8...]0_0000011224444ⱦvfVG8h_,hOJQJ^JaJh/cphOJQJ^JaJh/cphOJQJ]^JaJh_,h4OJQJ]^JaJ"h_,hx^H*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hx^OJQJ]^JaJh_,h5OJQJ^Jh^c5OJQJ^Jh_,hJ,aOJQJ^JaJh_,h/OJQJ]^JaJ"h_,hJ,aH*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hJ,aOJQJ]^JaJhOJQJ]^JaJ44 5;77788U8V89999: :;;$ ^a$gd*3$ & F ^a$gd*3 ^gd*3 ^`gd*3 x^gd^c xgd^c & F dxgd^c4 5 5 55;7B77778888V8[89"999 ::;.;6<7<<<<= =z={====>>??@@$AAAAA B B Bͽ͏͏}͏}}"h_,h5OJQJ]^JaJh_,h5OJQJ^JaJh_,h\IOJQJ^JaJh_,hOJQJ^JaJh_,h>*OJQJ^JaJ"h_,h>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hJ,aOJQJ]^JaJh_,hOJQJ]^JaJ1;7<8<o<<<=={=|===>>??@@$A%A]AAA B ^gd$ ^a$gd*3 ^gd*3 B BB5BBB>F=IKLLMMMMMMMNNNNNQO^gdd#v & F .d^.`gd; & F dgd9[gdd#vdhgdd#v gd BB5B~BBBB-C7CCCEE>FKKLLLLM MMMҵ}}n_O=O="h_,hd#v>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hd#vOJQJ]^JaJh9[hd#vOJQJ^JaJh/cphd#vOJQJ^JaJ'h_,h OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h_,h5OJQJ]^JaJsH#h_,h OJQJ]^JaJsHh_,h OJQJ]^JaJh_,5OJQJ^JaJh_,hd#v5OJQJ^JaJh_,hd#vOJQJ^JaJh_,hOJQJ^JaJMMMNN[NNNRO\OUPWPzP{P|PPPP?Q@Q`QaQwQxQQξxgS??'h; h; OJQJ]^JaJmH sH 'h_,h#OJQJ]^JaJmH sH !hOJQJ]^JaJmH sH 'h7hOJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h_,h#OJQJ]^JaJsHh_,h#5OJQJ^JaJh_,hd#v5OJQJ^JaJh_,h"5OJQJ^JaJh_,hd#vOJQJ^JaJ"h_,hd#v>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hd#vOJQJ]^JaJQOROUPVPWP{P|PHRWsYHZZ[\\\\$]%]]^gd4 $8^8a$gd\ $ & Fa$gd"gd" & F .d^.`gd; & F dgd\7Tdhgdd#v^gdd#vQQQQHRKRRSSSSS'SyT{TTUUUUUVVWWWXWjWkWW+Y/Y\\\\\Ｊyj[h\7Th"OJQJ^JaJh_,h"OJQJ^JaJh/cph"OJQJ^JaJh_,h"OJQJ]^JaJ"h_,h#H*OJQJ]^JaJ"h7hcH*OJQJ]^JaJhcOJQJ]^JaJ'h_,h#OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h_,h#OJQJ]^JaJsHh_,h#OJQJ]^JaJ#\\#]$]%]4]]]]]^^__=`B`aaaabb cc6c@c5dRd[ddddd$e%eͻvvvvv߫cc%jh_,h"OJQJU^JaJ"h_,h">*OJQJ]^JaJ'h_,h">*OJQJ^JaJmH sH h_,h"OJQJ^JaJh_,h">*OJQJ^JaJ"h_,h\5OJQJ]^JaJ"h\h"5OJQJ]^JaJh_,h"5OJQJ^JaJh_,h"OJQJ]^JaJ"]]]]^^__<`=`aaaabb c c5c6c4d5dQd$ & F^a$gd" $^a$gd4$ & F^a$gd4^gd4QdRdeeffHfyffffffMgNgGh kjk^l & F dgd~dhgdd#vgd"^gd" & F^gd"h^hgd"^gd4^gd"%e>e?eeeyfffMgNgggFhGh kikͽ͚ͪ|h|WG3'hAYhAYOJQJ]^JaJmH sH hAYhAYOJQJ]^JaJ!hAYOJQJ]^JaJmH sH 'h91h91OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #hAYhAYOJQJ]^JaJsHh"OJQJ^JaJh_,h"5OJQJ^JaJ$h_,h"OJQJ^JaJmH sH h_,h">*OJQJ^JaJh_,h"OJQJ^JaJ%jh_,h"OJQJU^JaJ h_,h"0JOJQJ^JaJikjk^lllmmmm mrmmmmmmOoPoRoSoXoooo2p3pҼr`rQrrBh\h\OJQJ^JaJhMOJQJ]^JaJh"h\h\OJQJ\^JaJh%h\h\>*OJQJ]^JaJh*h\h\OJQJ]^JaJhmH sH "h\h\OJQJ]^JaJhh\OJQJ]^JaJh*h\h\5CJOJPJQJ^JaJhh\OJQJ^JaJhAYhAYOJQJ]^JaJ!hAYOJQJ]^JaJmH sH ^lllmmmmmmmnnnQoSooo & F 7uG$^`ugdM 7hG$^hgdM 7G$gdM 7zG$^zgd91$ 7G$a$gd\$ 77G$^7a$gdh< & F .d^.`gd91o2p3p4ppp9qtu=vKwlxyz,{|h}ЀӀ x0^`0gdh< & F gdh< & F dgd~ & F d^`gd~gd"gdM 7hG$^hgdM3p4p5p}p~ppppppppuqwqttvv=vvvTwcwxy︦~nananTnnhtOJQJ]^JaJhcOJQJ]^JaJh_,hY}OJQJ]^JaJ&h_,hY}H*OJQJ]^JaJsH'h_,hY}OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #h_,hY}OJQJ]^JaJsHh_,h_,5OJQJ^JaJht5OJQJ^JaJh*X45OJQJ^JaJh915OJQJ^JaJh_,h"5OJQJ^JaJЀрԀ KLMU µ•q••aRFh_,OJQJ^JaJh_,h_,OJQJ^JaJh_,h_,>*OJQJ^JaJ"h_,h_,H*OJQJ]^JaJ"h_,h_,>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hh<OJQJ]^JaJh_,h_,OJQJ]^JaJhh<OJQJ]^JaJh_,OJQJ]^JaJh_,hY}OJQJ]^JaJh/cphY}OJQJ]^JaJh_,h4OJQJ]^JaJӀLM 45$$ 7G$^a$gdh<$$ & F 7G$^`a$gdh<$ & F 7G$^`a$gdh<^gdh< x0^`0gdh< 345OrstyPQUĴĴĴĴĴzj]K#h:h:OJQJ]^JaJsHh:g6OJQJ^JaJh_,h:g6OJQJ^JaJh_,ht5OJQJ^JaJh"5OJQJ^JaJh_,hh<OJQJ]^JaJh_,OJQJ]^JaJh_,h_,OJQJ]^JaJ"h_,h_,>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,OJQJ^JaJh_,h_,OJQJ^JaJh_,hh<OJQJ^JaJ5stQ! Jz{ƗǗ^gdNPgdNP & F .d^.`gdt & F dgd~ dhxgdtgd"^gdh<Uh!@VW)?ݏ7N IJ{ǗЗϚ֚foɺ|h_,hNP>*OJQJ^JaJ"h_,hNP>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hNPOJQJ]^JaJh:OJQJ^JaJh:h:OJQJ^JaJh:h:OJQJ]^JaJ#h:h:OJQJ]^JaJsH'h:h:OJQJ]^JaJmH sH +ǗΚϚef{|ٞڞ۞pݣ & F d1$7$8$H$gdh< & F dgd~dgdgd"gd#^gdNP|ٞڞptuȣ|h|XI99h_,hpOJQJ]^JaJh_,hVQOJQJ^JaJhh<hAYOJQJ]^JaJ'hh<hVQOJQJ]^JaJmH sH hh<hVQOJQJ]^JaJ'h_,hVQOJQJ]^JaJmH sH h_,hVQOJQJ]^JaJh_,h"5OJQJ^JaJh_,h#OJQJ^JaJ"h_,hNP>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hNPOJQJ]^JaJh_,hNPOJQJ^JaJ+IJYbФ/=|[` HIJññññßñⓄtdWGhzKhzKOJQJ]^JaJha5OJQJ^JaJh_,ha5OJQJ^JaJh_,h}G-5OJQJ^JaJh_,h}G-OJQJ^JaJhtOJQJ^JaJ"h_,hez'H*OJQJ]^JaJ"h_,hez'>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,hez'OJQJ]^JaJh_,h"OJQJ^JaJh_,hez'OJQJ^JaJh/cphez'OJQJ^JaJJYФѤ12|}pZ[ ^ gdez' & F;^`;gdez' & FF^`Fgdez'^gdez' ^gd_ & F .d^.`gdt IJްȱhc 1$7$8$H$`gdAY & F .d^.`gd^ c & F dgdh< & F dgd~ x^gd_^gdAY^gdAY ^`gdAY ,[~ĶնȳȞےuccQccc"h_,heOH*OJQJ]^JaJ"h_,heO>*OJQJ]^JaJhAYOJQJ]^JaJh_,heOOJQJ]^JaJhCS.OJQJ^JaJ(hzKhzK6B*OJQJ^JaJph(hzKhzKB*H*OJQJ^JaJph%hzKhzKB*OJQJ^JaJphhzKhzKOJQJ]^JaJ'hzKhzKOJQJ]^JaJmH sH öĶƷǷqrHI x^gd_^gdeO & F;^`;gdeO^gdeO^gdAYHIN>?@nop~оЮr`L:&'hh<hQQOJQJ]^JaJmH sH #hh<hQQOJQJ]^JaJsH'hh<hh<OJQJ]^JaJmH sH #hh<hh<OJQJ]^JaJsH#hQQhQQOJQJ]^JaJsHh55OJQJ^JaJha5OJQJ^JaJh_,ha5OJQJ^JaJh_,heO5OJQJ^JaJ"h_,heO>*OJQJ]^JaJh_,heOOJQJ]^JaJh_,heOOJQJ^JaJh_,heO>*OJQJ^JaJ?@oǾ3Xq ^gd3lW gd3lW & F .d^.`gd^ c & F dgdeO & F dgdh< & F dgdQQ xgd_ x^gd_ƾǾ3pqpq݋ݘݘ{l]QE]hh<OJQJ^JaJh3lWOJQJ^JaJh_,h3lWOJQJ^JaJh/cph3lWOJQJ^JaJhh<h3lW5OJQJ^JaJh9cbOJQJ]^JaJhcOJQJ]^JaJhQQhQQOJQJ]^JaJ'h^ chQQOJQJ]^JaJmH sH 'hh<hQQOJQJ]^JaJmH sH hh<hQQOJQJ]^JaJ#hh<hQQOJQJ]^JaJsH/0601hx||IcLQ ˻ˬ|oha5OJQJ^JaJh_,ha5OJQJ^JaJh_,h3lW5OJQJ^JaJh_,h3lW>*OJQJ^JaJh_,h3lWOJQJ^JaJh_,h3lWOJQJ\^JaJ"h_,h3lW5OJQJ\^JaJ"h_,h3lW>*OJQJ\^JaJh_,h3lWOJQJ]^JaJ({|{|HIKL gdeO^gdez' gdeO ^gd3lW ##$VWfo(#$7n޽|i|i|i|i|i|V|C|C|i%h_,h OJQJ\]^JaJh%hi:Ch OJQJ\]^JaJh%h_,h >*OJQJ]^JaJh"h_,h OJQJ]^JaJhhzhY}5OJQJ^JaJhzh OJQJ^JaJh@(h OJQJ]^JaJh@(h@(OJQJ]^JaJ!h^ cOJQJ]^JaJmH sH 'h@(h@(OJQJ]^JaJmH sH h@(5OJQJ^JaJ $Wf $ ;^`;a$gd65 ;^`;gdeO^gdez' ^gd  x0^`0gd  & F .d^.`gd^ c & F dgdh<Ec/rreUCU"h1h1H*OJQJ]^JaJh1h1OJQJ]^JaJhZ5OJQJ^JaJh_5OJQJ^JaJh655OJQJ^JaJhzh656OJQJ^JaJh65h65OJQJ^JaJha5OJQJ^JaJh_,ha5OJQJ^JaJ%h_,h >*OJQJ]^JaJh%h_,h OJQJ\]^JaJh"h_,h OJQJ]^JaJh8CRS|}^gdp^gdz ;^`;gdz & F .d^.`gd^ c & F d1$7$8$H$gdz & F dgdh< ;^`;gdeO/$BCDRSd}"(ᲣueeeeVNJNJNJNJhfjhfUh_,h OJQJ^JaJh_,hp>*OJQJ^JaJh_,heOOJQJ^JaJh_,hp5OJQJ^JaJhzhpOJQJ^JaJh_,hpOJQJ^JaJh/cphpOJQJ^JaJhzh65OJQJ]^JaJhzh1OJQJ]^JaJh1h1OJQJ]^JaJh1h1OJQJ^JaJ!" 6FGH Bdhgdez'^gdp8^8gdp & F`gdp$%&236;<BCDEFHPQRS\`ahiopqrth_,h OJQJ^JaJhfhIq(hg\hquCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH hn*mH sH hf)h0JmHnHu hqu0Jjhqu0JUhqumH sH hn*hhFhqu%Hastuvdhgdez'  B ] ? 0 00P&P . A!"#$n% Dp? 0 00P&P . A!"#$n% Dpn/'  ƹdPNG  IHDRqW pHYs.#.#x?vgAMAOX2tEXtSoftwareAdobe ImageReadyqe</QIDATxb`` &=(4F(<CG(T4` ELZ)Q0 h`A0 Fu@Q0 g s"{ Q0 hQ0*@Т@?`(`Q0@Q0 F(#(`Q0@1(6k@GcE` .0ughQ@}@h0OxaѠ F7Q0xqѠ F+Q0 u˃Ѡ F(73y(8` 0r >8$`Ph7 F(|/O$Ȱ ~8@V~`Q@[` UlPxq4* F+Q0 F( [;@;J WώOЁ@#zH F+Q0 F(gT=@alj#P/T n#g@( (T8. A ^ACŏ Ѹ  Ft;@.2Xz<πy`4@q˻|C/g?Sq Y F$:P:#ѡ?G ǑF`$8+ô~S+@>IQ硅hp[P#G@gcqπR4hZՒ(,t 6ď6cICQDLDK<:O8@?Z܎7 l7t 0t%@2@D>׏ ^~*Oz/'==zKoo |/pЬ1wʀ^yz_َҷm-V؞G+lGvnCF#"E W^ZRo[؎{hi{ z $ C*@Ww,EM*Qj/5B0$Gi٠v&(F+@*@ٝg\wb 9ÐAC 9Q0+C5#MԮI>= Cc?' V0z'v0eE0To3@'FPt: IC rEO#F+@XZbk8Ѻ7FNbx|3nU6~P3F92Im@3?I=10DH.}F\VNS@U~\D2Iڽ1rVRR!n`hwʡDʏhagR5R{ؤVȣ薆Q穙֕`(lG}#$&V~C5a` s+?Rhat8muh7}.7g@1R&ILT @|q4} H4yx"g⇣Q2$њeX2 0Q4 FHPvOSE?Ll~4<:z#4F(<y y8x$f;+;>p@Q0 Ǜ3 t P>>OA/$m@h_ OHD_bGGzyI ւP(]` @q]~4 EN C8(ȋ}@B*4Rpʞąj ZXG(7fЖ~h7 6y6#ϓd&z @V~x=7 x2 od}#*Dh` R@!nRnbH0e;oQ0>&@|p@>Q¯ 4ZQ0 '@JA5*`GR{4ZQ0 F{} > ڤ,p0zmT ,}Xn: F`(Hza0L+^&؀ ğUYGhXz8 F( vZ6N@>t ~8'f&JCi8V~=4 F( h 0TDH? @zs@1Q=Pu!r$ 8 .BOqj@El@׽(@ 校4Ȑ `+`(صHviy8 ߜ/(*X+he( S_U[Ofoʷ]ru{<jSπVvXvlM<($b/ h7t*?"F vjG?ZȞK=Fu[4Z >PZ)3($5R~|èC3RΞat*ba@G(lŠ4K*H@GR2%`˷R;qQra0 pJ_ROj哅A3l&@DPeM@V~\ #bAA.Ux4H@*Fi@e!۵"C5nFgd4^k XFgȂ`χaQ@[TUj wQ ^h7 F(GQ#40Z`W2 @#lOѴ0 FT~^3 F*?l 1=z`^(@)T~4ZQ0hY(~0;hQ@OpJ;0 1Xn3`/iU$PO { X$@`4-A Yua}C @R6 P@ f85?@ht(`f`Ѩ0n 9k] ; c0 @(,`6[[-tl=ROSxg8n96H``pBl(U9`)tFBwZZ(@6+l 1u İz0r\D?8nhtsQ@˞߁W{hO yTCaE;0 *%^&UvbT'2@?T?LO=Z}w`a@#`=7rZy|8PZEЀ f @/tyNR2 UĔN`@,?\H;0 F(P@kmGπzhi#JR#JȬ` *0 \Vj=ЅP\U'@[T`=SU` Pӳ2|>hQ0 F{-vUd70v1^ lV 3@s miU = 3`?-^ @]8 P1ty`KZh Pm r 9LV4i>PC6p*P1Chޛ0bv XТф<-@#Sn>#рp!Q0 ѳ@Pyph#u ʙ Y9W\*HT6OPL0 Þ CpG@34pb9P뇪S@?qaŧeGS68@գ~w/N`@lǠ4)@s~C\Ѻ$`WP;q8xh#uyĂP!z{ 4R` , PWp`@YRcO"a@ЭFda6Zq`U|^=TyĞ8]4B<1^HbŁmi*hr1p(L W?W]D >Jh7[ѣ"ۢ ?\*x0h9^^d j,o耇Xz2@")j@4x<[ Bj? #2 Fj0Lz 7׆!``C"*vW X\ hڕho HeCJ WHO{qd,  {!aO{4LpzF(L2MT@ehƃAn=+d+y/4ZѶ1\0:7 FrWRKdaq<1S '0 . P?ѳ=ݽg~` ,pTFȽBZrnw@?s & Xe 6dT_(`@v0a}A 0X @#76ܐ0 F( #ƠB}>;og@uHFA($@GD1ڏ|dlOE``=uF=げP%;!o:ju{y$T9lf0YU5=z|C'!RO;~hT~ìb_< o cd?`?D*?y$w9>T>i(oY'³B +||"*BzT` @s~C"6s뫨p400?/H k.>~C+ 9?J@Q"pԽ lAh$muN h|5j@!c]  DVwC{>C˻ /F2Aqs| vyꭗ@4* ?$(}Q0Hiv? kpTfDh`z(X6CeJ ? Nht%>ч͡<"08Nfi@ o!#lJK  MDkRTf0 ;6G+0`Υ ļ`=c`qT TўG+Q0`b@ak@"ϑ!˜zh4EÆ aJjzqc;v 4*O G)A="lOjaC~HC?BË^W7X Q02{~m=6A~T9"`P]͋kqP)@? C?]XF( ya+}*}+ho`7;(V&bA 4 @#7o=Rw```r'?@p E,^w0`^φܳQ>[@OAhhy,-Pdב3 -zI vX<@,~0nSX@Z9qpD~F6cHf>hU~朘8 Z/=0ZQG C0B Ghz sZ8z; _4P!.P(@aGYKFhںHFhU~F( Gл6"1XHbfO>;AT~i~@W F(\=|\P[+Y PRZ!$xh@!Od# Z@. 0q = F`5 Ѽ+@s5M;K~ Tc DrC""@DPq[l3h*{-p6ht(,`@: }- ]SZ̢uϷvutw80 ncv%l@D凬vNp" % FZw`||f }p e%'@J^h^C+ wy40 <;@^ l!FXF$h7 F4 BZ,bO'AiZ?jH=3lC߰^ꜙ |ԍ =Ai[?``гc@j.0X@94OU-@LîJ`ϩFh Bqr +hâanR`}]j,HLz/#MH=d` Z 7J5LIXjpy,y1Oi%klDKG(hJQ0 F-"{X0=A==lOC{ \ ŭX6?@t Fbw`<`PU~ 4`Q҃wa2 aO "W@=Q0 Fh击\rVh )|KhҪ4`@ [wh$V~F(PЦg0?Gy ;S=@Xg`0P!Z Z?T ߧAwG[-:ݧFgvL 0Je6F@#qh7 swt`s(V~IF\vⴁuq ~@. zڣG SZ/y 4ư2@ots VZ`C @ U^Fd@GIJh/P)J@ߐ19}C^V3TkqKdz"a?|\Uw쇚cVvb9B:8@Sׅ/11 Ddl2-IɮQ0xhCV[*T 5(3(ȭr{TҲ o@ժO<+?B=eFyqD^?a̸=OaOD59{UvTL#{}4 ^@Жb<twV}1 `QO-h `7 #aSknd!6BO`@][qV``5h,y?ʨ 9n\wC09't9ۀ(` '0{<=1j`=dG(Pߓ4@Q0 F@?riX '̕1n[π:WObH64hQ0 GLO XET Dʏ^?}2R<9>֜(F(`? e$_bnD;!e@ d|2Pd O :40^WkEh8?D7) V#@bcģCC $u> ԣ%z ,\JQحv ƞ~2e>=KtsFh7@=Z?+?{4Z3 q!S7X+DClg >W F+QBL F+QчIDn>pG#@Rk4<^0lQ@)xm z Hݫvq4JP 0;x  wN!nP:PgeNz KU@ +F(ƶT| ͞3237C{3Pp8'#o3KTh7Gh7|R*$lq#vanS.]@hth7Gh7JPR [*U lǨ[}̕w @(ţph)W #>e F(F0(Hl%d@3D؉1i' 3}a>hţx )T 5G\Jn#v)E4^Ks@[F(n(0 hKZ\'A" (; oO 74e-# hQ0 Fg~*)=\k^m?&?,@Joq@1Q0 FОJC"͉ ;N*ڹ+>Hz{h8!ԌơhQ0 F2ы"XZ5G$e*Ky[4F(Ra3~ a+MIr$g>H2Q4 F(+APOJL!chݻq|@Q0 ?a9\׉( 9|PPs;<M7ާ<{Of`P]2 FrѠ8-I`d` ~ JfAK.@ P;A~4"2eXmQ4 Fn}pcZj ;tئ=E` 0z *Bg*D +BǞ @Þ` *FO=BХ ށ@i˃aÕH #dF(\S(@(,G}*B*ph<Ob< Marge 7G$aJJrJ eO Paragraphe de liste ^PK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭V,cy$gc.bAn̖kեC A0vs<>6r=*%@&ٖ6دk.~8$ 6./lS _//"JFV!zn^3ੵ,_wr%8/[k.$eVi2[Psjcs7f WKՆ7dg ȘJj|j(KD- dXiJ؇2x$( :'vɗsKZj{Zb&^>{?=уG]8 ˻^|ɟ>D<Ϫ~j ̜?_|+!D7!18fZNFl;I(q =9S̲8vt xur1xEu5$ IA.N&)f^݈8f2((}B*C .X;u0 ɐjmڦ1eZ3ۉm-r"+00~Hƫxp\%rcVu*#Sq= !a"e՞-%ƪL.R(_%:漌iv@}OCbU|Cp0ݷ)q}2ܢcҬ@ULC5@W4;fj8?| Tބӫg"qzr7$%G[r~KS򌅁,bm3v 1el\fp}X̕4A 6{ASLt(Q%\rl_٫fS_B,sHvx`Wr~(BshUr) 64Cebs)bMjBUkp:6GyZL3E2rQ$)9G񄨕v$5˳:Y+x%vYRnNöj.7= .Yo|%lٟ̦gl厹MPW6s;< liGY Dk/7!@Ί5( Z2_]Zѱ_3*E шMR*uahG.9gMW~#fpv4; !6o%JۍsgwŴ9R.+<+΀FS*BiDpT ߅PT/ȁa.jHP8T$Z2wzvvY,d*dL#r@Ps>=A6hן=Qr9LV638h&T-;ƬFtExZƚxY(wHH>vu[xA@U_iG08E[LZ m6:9Oc֖&g v1^<`gvbm2{Eai_dLbd_.$z ~30%M1T =0}o5PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ttheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] XAX 9ggg od(4 BMQ\%eik3p U /xz}~ #4; BQO]Qd^loӀ5Ǘ Hy{|AC\$]>]&tX,35Y`b!t!tl,b$'  ƹd/X@J(    c AÖ notext-bw)K\ \S6i{7i?)I)8S,8S,I<IR?`Tt(`T!Rg 7F,)#" `?B S  ?]< T@PtNBC3;@HIScioz%+1DM\`E M N T knozDOT\""d#m#$$$&&&&&&((8 999HHHHHHHHHHHHHHIIPISI[I\I`IjIwIPJXJ`JfJpJsJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ[\^^^^R_^_t_}_____________J`Q`To_ojtuyfmV^CP˩өpr !)-5TZfmnu!*$& "\_W V a m `_(b(00364;4<4o4r4~55%9'9]9_99 :;=>EE|HGJKK MM+Q.Q6[3\N_F`dd h"hh8i9ismtmai+b9cb^ c:g/cpHqIq0u\uqud#vzyYzY}%GM Z~f)65n*g= XPr; f4 4Gua4&:zK3 $tg\h<JY NP^c15(VQwF{^clphDy`vxoj_,\#aLRVFfgT(k #8 ypQ"Km?}m+!@@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial7.@Calibri5. .[`)Tahoma?= * Courier New;WingdingsA$BCambria Math#qhDggDg?d##ud##u24 3qHX?Y 2!xx Restricted distributionIOCBoned, Patrice<         Oh+'0X     ,8@HPRestricted distributionIOCNormalBoned, Patrice3Microsoft Office Word@:@e x@e x@0x#d#՜.+,D՜.+,T hp  UNESCOu  Restricted distributionRestricted distribution+INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO)'Twenty-seventh Session of the AssemblyParis, 26 June - 5 July 2013DRAFT SUMMARY REPORTPart 3 TitreTitle Headings , 8@ _PID_HLINKSA&Vhttp://www.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=10401  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~  Root Entry F0x Data 1TableLWordDocument oSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStore0 0x0x51CBCHP==20 0x0xItem  PropertiesUCompObj r   F Document Microsoft Word 97-2003 MSWordDocWord.Document.89q