ࡱ>  0 lbjbj 8ccbH H H H H \ \ \ 8 T L\ ?4!:n!(!!!#"# $n?p?p?p?p?p?p?${C-F?H $##"$$?H H !!"?&&&$6H !H !n?&$n?&&6&;=!_l"F%<Z??0?"<`G%G8=,GH =$$&$$$$$??&$$$?$$$$G$$$$$$$$$$ : Summary This document has been prepared in pursuance of  HYPERLINK \l "d4" Decision EC-XLVII/Dec.4 of the Executive Council at its 47th session, which established the Intersessional Working Group on the Future of the IOC to make recommendations to this Assembly. Decision proposed: paragraph 33. The tasks for the intersessional Working Group on the Future of the IOC as decided by the IOC Assembly in IOC-XXVII/Dec.(5.1), was how to develop the following three areas: Rationalized Cooperation and Communication between IOC and Other Organizations (identify overlap and optimize cooperation) Enhanced Flexibility and Adaptability of IOC Governance (increase involvement of ocean research community) Sharpened IOCs Identity (small number of high priority programmes supported by science). Written input was received from five Member States. Fifteen Member States formally nominated representatives to the open-ended working group. Forty-nine persons from 19 Member States and three observers took part in the face to face discussion meeting on 30 June 2014. The discussion in the group revealed that there is general consensus on the key issues to be addressed under the three areas. Some points raised in the discussion were reported by the Chair of the Intersessional Working Group to the IOC Executive Council at its 47th session: For area 1: Rationalized Cooperation and Communication between IOC and Other Organizations Further develop the cooperation with WMO Improve IOCs contribution of ocean science advice to organizations including IMO and UNEP and regional bodies Clarify IOCs role as standard setter and explore cooperation with ISO Clarify complementarity with SCOR. For area 2: Enhanced Flexibility and Adaptability of IOC Governance Mobilize the Member States and their elected representatives Re-activate the role as specialized mechanism for interagency cooperation Identify a focal organization for IOC in each Member State Invite the regions to propose new ways to handle regional governance including fundraising For area 3: Sharpened IOCs Identity: Observations is a common element and trigger of science, services, forecasts, capacities and also the area of activity where the intergovernmental nature of IOC plays a key role Provide Member States with a solid ocean science basis for solutions to societal problems IOC should be the technical body providing science based advice Funding issues are key for IOC to deliver on its mandate. The strategy for obtaining funding is to try all arguments on all fronts, i.e. both within UNESCO and by other means. The shortfall for IOC is small compared to investments in marine science related activities made by Member States through other routes. The IOC should actively engage with current and emerging, non-governmental participants in the area of the oceans to establish itself as the competent body on oceanography. The IOC Executive Council at its 47th session in July 2014 expressed its appreciation to the Chair of the Intersessional Working Group and to Member States that participated in its work. The Executive Council set priorities for the issues to be further explored by the intersessional working group and decided that it should report to the Assembly in 2015 with concrete proposals on how to move forward in addressing each of the issues (EC-XLVII, Dec.4). The Future of the IOC The Executive Council, Having considered the report of the Chair of the intersessional and sessional working groups on the Future of IOC (IOC/EC-XLVII/2 Annex 6), Noting the consensus reached by IOC Member States that the IOC Governing Bodies should maintain in their agendas an item and mechanism to enable Member States to continuously reflect and exchange ideas on this highly strategic and important subject, Recalling that the Assembly at its 27th Session suggested in Decision IOC-XXVII/Dec.5.1 that the areas of deliberation should focus on sharpening IOCs identity, as well as on rationalized cooperation and communication between IOC and other organizations, and enhanced flexibility and adaptability of IOC governance, Taking into account the documents of the 47th session of the Executive Council on the Future of the IOC which provided an overview of issues, suggested solutions and priorities, including the Report of the Chair of the Intersessional Working Group on The Future of the IOC, and the IOC Workshop Reports 250, 254, and 261 and Future 13-14/Inf.1, Taking advantage of the self-assessment of the IOC in the context of the ongoing process of the External Audit of the Governance of UNESCO, Acknowledging the relevance of the Medium-Term Strategy for the Future of the IOC, Expresses its appreciation to Professor Peter M. Haugan for his leadership and contribution to the work of the intersessional and sessional working groups; Requests the IOC officers on behalf of the Member States and with support from the secretariat to intensify efforts prior to the next IOC Assembly to: pursue clarification of the interpretation and implementation of the role of IOC as an intergovernmental body with functional autonomy within UNESCO, explore regular and extrabudgetary funding mechanisms to provide stability and continuity to the work of IOC, consistent with article 10 of the IOC Statutes, undertake an assessment of the established IOC functional autonomy within the UNESCO dispositions, and provide information on its degree of implementation for the use of the Intersessional Working Group on The Future of the IOC; Requests Member States and the IOC officers, with support from secretariat to intensify efforts to: Raise the profile of IOC within the United Nations system to make sure that the unique mandate of IOC in the United Nations systems understood and communicated widely, ensure enhanced visibility of IOC across the marine science and marine policy sector and stimulate involvement from youth and young scientists, including through taking advantage of modern social media technologies Decides that the open-ended intersessional working group on the Future of the IOC be reconvened under the chairmanship of Professor Haugan with a view to providing proposals for each of the following issues to the IOC Assembly at its 28th Session in 2015: formulate a common message from IOC to UNESCO and other UN organizations about the societal benefits of the IOC mission, programs and activities, and develop a strategy for dissemination, including preparation of information material on IOC for use in Member States, develop recommendations for strengthening IOC mission implementation by linking the issues already identified during the process with the Medium-Term Strategy, revised with criteria of prioritization, consider new or expanded roles for sub-commissions and other regional subsidiary bodies of IOC in achieving the strengthening under (ii), consider the information provided under 8(iii) above and develop recommendations, as appropriate, in the context of its function as a joint specialized mechanism in the UN system; Decides that the intersessional working group shall work primarily by electronic means and should consider establishment of a task team on 10(iv) and consider establishment of other task teams led by interested Member States to develop the different sub-tasks where appropriate. Decides to request the IOC Assembly at its 28th Session to consider the appropriateness of presenting a special report on these issues for the consideration of UNESCO Governing Bodies, including the decisions taken on the Future of the IOC by the IOC Assembly at its 28th Session in 2015. The following countries signed up for the IWG by responding to IOC  HYPERLINK "http://www.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=14021" Circular Letter 2539: Angola, Australia, Benin, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Cuba, Egypt, Germany, Ghana, Grenada, Japan, Iran, Mexico, Monaco, Portugal, Tanzania, UK, USA. Following consultations by correspondence, the open-ended Intersessional Working Group held a face-to-face meeting on 16 June 2015. This meeting was attended by more than 30 Member States. Five regional workshop reports referenced in the documentation provided overview of issues, suggested solutions and priorities discussed by the group. In a generic vision the first meeting in Varna 2012 focussed on forecasting services and data. The second meeting in Rio 2013 strengthened these points and also stressed development of capabilities and links to decision-makers. The third meeting in Bangkok 2013 emphasized enhanced recognition by governmental decision-makers, development of operational oceanography and standard setting. Also regional participation and interbasin exchange was highlighted. The fourth meeting in Utrecht 2014 expanded further upon these points suggesting that the highest priority should be Observing System/Data Management, relationships with UNESCO and re-establishing IOCs role in the UN system. And the 5th meeting in Nairobi in 2015 provided further perspectives of operational oceanography including capacity development and collaboration. Detailed accounts are available in each of the individual reports. Since the first session of the Working Group on the Future of the IOC in 2008, the topic of the Future of the IOC has been continuously on the agenda of the IOC governing bodies, due to a recognized need to reflect on the development of the organization and its role. In this context, former IOC chair Javier Valladares deserves particular thanks for facilitating and leading many of the intermediate steps taken in various incarnations of working groups over these years. The representative of United Kingdom presented their National Commission for UNESCO  HYPERLINK "http://www.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=14946" Policy Brief 13: An evaluation of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commissions role in global marine science and oceanography. It concludes very clearly that the IOC membership is of great benefit for the UK. The report also describes the changing landscape of marine science and oceanography, and asks questions about how to best develop IOCs role in this landscape in the coming years. The group had a constructive debate with interventions from 20 Member States. The main issues arising from the discussion are summarized below. Historical background The IOC was created in 1960 to meet the need for intergovernmental cooperation in ocean research and observations, and to provide a mechanism to facilitate development and coordinated implementation of major international ocean research efforts, data exchange and required standardizations. In response, the IOC was established as a functionally autonomous body within UNESCO. Oceanography, just as meteorology and hydrology, is international by necessity. It requires cooperation as well as coordination and pooling of resources, being costly in terms of manpower and infrastructure. The intergovernmental mechanism to help achieve this was thus established, also to stimulate and support capacity development, data exchange and storage, and building of trust. Results show that IOC has so far delivered satisfactorily on all these points, despite changing conditions for ocean research and ocean governance and thus IOC itself. Can the IOC continue to deliver satisfactorily? The Statutes state that the mission of the IOC is to promote cooperation and coordinate programmes in ocean research, services and capacity building. This does not differ from the original motivation for the creation of the IOC, but the view has been expressed that the IOC presently cannot deliver on this (Utrecht 2014). This may be related to the institutional situation the IOC is now facing. When the IOC was created it was the only UN body wholly engaged for the ocean mission whereas now there are many institutions and other organizations having the marine environment or parts thereof within their mandate. If the IOC mission is understood as being to coordinate all related activities concerning ocean research, observations, data exchange and services, the task is much beyond the present means of the IOC. There is a serious mismatch between available research demands, capacity to deliver and the increasing expectations of Member States (WG 2008). The institutional situation is reflected at the national level. It also shows, however, the importance now attached by governments as well as public and private enterprises to the ocean and its resources, including coastal zones and shelf seas. Ideas to address the situation The consultation suggests the understanding that science is the driving force behind the IOC, that there is also a need to reach beyond the scientific community, that the cohesiveness of the IOC needs be strengthened. This can be achieved through enhanced involvement of Member States at high level, including in the governing bodies, and of the expertise of Member States including through more use of subsidiary bodies as subject area committees and the regional bodies, and identification of focal points, all functioning together with the elected officers and the Secretariat (Rio 2013). This may result in less emphasis on programme implementation by the IOC Secretariat and an improved balance between inclusiveness of Member States views or priorities and response of the IOC Secretariat to unplanned demands and new issues (Utrecht 2014). High level involvement of Member States can help achieving more financial support from UNESCO regular funds as well as more contributions to the IOC special account, using Article 10 of the Statutes (WG 2008). Such high level involvement would also enhance cooperation and coordination of the activities in which IOC is involved together with a more coherent representation of needs in IOC/UNESCO and UN (Bulgaria 2012). In this context the need for the identification of a clear national counterpart, focal point, to IOC by Member States is underlined (WG 2008). The Consultations brought out that involvement of policy and decision-makers at high level requires an active advocacy, with personal contacts, on the importance of the scientific basis for a sound and sustainable management, development and governance of the marine environment and its resources, including coastal areas (Bulgaria 2012 and Rio 2013). This could also help achieving strengthened coordination of ocean actions within the UN Community and lead to more regional cooperation and technical exchange. Who can do it and how? The task could fall on the Executive Secretary and the elected officers, all having organizational authority, including to control funds. The science focus can be highlighted through a standing item on sciences at the Governing body meetings which should lead to a strengthened connect with the broader scientific community of Member States. However, the session has to be organized in a proactive way, meaning that there should be invited scientists covering different fields, going beyond the pure IOC programmes. This effort would supplement the IOC A. Bruun and R. Revelle memorial lectures. Together with the documented need for increased awareness of decision and policy makers, as well as the public, on ocean issues which the advocacy efforts should meet and the role of the IOC in addressing the issues, these actions should lead to stronger involvement of Member States, including their participation in governing body meetings and in the Sustained Ocean Observations and Services programme. Enhanced involvement of the scientific and technical communities of Member States and with their support would also help the activities keeping abreast with technical advances. Demonstrate results and opportunities The advocacy efforts with policy and decision makers and high level national officials should include demonstration projects showing results to help convince them. Examples should be brought out of opportunities for job and wealth creation at local and national level from sustainable development of coastal and ocean resources on basis of science and observations. This could result in enhanced political will and commitment of Member States (WG 2008). Cost-benefit analyses can be used together with demonstration sites to help convince the targets, as shown by several regional programmes, for instance the Yellow Sea LME and PEMSEA. A great range of services can be brought out where a programme as Sustained Ocean Observations and Services including GOOS has been and is contributing in many economically important areas from basin-wide to local and beach conditions (Rio 2013). There remains a great need to quantify and report on the economy of the ocean and values of the marine and coastal ecosystems (Bulgaria 2012). Blue-green economy Such actions go well with the need to demonstrate the contributions of ocean sectors to the blue-green economy and the related opportunities for job and wealth creation, as identified in the Blueprint for Ocean and Coastal Sustainability of IOC/UNESCO, IMO, FAO and UNDP 2011. As identified above, an important, possibly leading, challenge and task for the IOC is to increase the awareness of the demonstrated ocean and coastal issues in governments and in the public, together with the role of the IOC in addressing them (Bangkok 2013). The regional bodies may be used as a vector for this (Bangkok 2013). The goal can be achieved through regional leadership seminars using the IOC regional subsidiary bodies and ensuring participation of governments, policy and decision makers, public and private enterprises, reaching beyond the scientific community (Bangkok 2013). This requires leadership which in the first place should be given by the Executive Secretary and the President, and possibly other officers, of the IOC. The efforts should include participation of national and regional agencies involved with forecasting, operations and services (Bangkok 2013). Link regional and global level At the global level, the IOC could pursue the advocacy for sustained ocean observations and services, including forecasting for climate variability, weather conditions, monsoons, typhoons, coastal protection and hazards, and other marine environment conditions for fisheries, shipping and pollution (Bangkok 2013). This could be done through the governing body meetings, interventions at meetings of other UN bodies, and advocacy with national representatives at these bodies (WG 2008). There is a strong need to ensure that these are aware of the IOC and its role and can refer to this at meetings of these other UN bodies. Arrangements of side events at other UN-associated meetings can be useful, also in this context, possibly in cooperation with other bodies of the Blueprint for Ocean and Coastal Sustainability, as a response to needs identified by the Consultations (Bangkok 2013, Bulgaria 2012, Rio 2013). The sustained ocean observations (operational oceanography) and services programme including GOOS can also provide a link between the regional and global programmes or projects (Bangkok 2013). High level debate on ocean issues and role in UN Community The experiences from IOC participation in major UN Conferences and in the Open-ended Consultation on the Law of the sea show that IOC is contributing significantly to a high-level debate on ocean issues. The participation in GESAMP and the publication of the Blueprint in 2011 are examples of the IOC function in cooperation and coordination within the UN Community. The IOC could use these results and experiences to further strengthen its role in the UN Community as the competent body in ocean science and demonstrate clearly its contribution to and role in Ocean Governance (Utrecht 2014), fully in line with the role of IOC given in UNCLOS. The limited means presently available to the IOC, however, necessitates specification of priority areas and coupling the related activities to a realistic budget allocation (Utrecht 2014). Address major interests of Member States The priority areas need be of major interest to Member States. Major issues now include coastal problems, generally including coastal protection and development, marine spatial planning, hazard assessments, resources from the ocean, wealth and job creation through Blue-green economy (Bulgaria 2012). Observations, data collection, storage and exchange are relevant to all these points, which decision makers and operational agencies need be constantly reminded about. This provides for a unique role for the IOC (Bulgaria 2012), relying on its mandates in UNCLOS and from UNCED 1992. In these contexts there is also a need to be aware of the importance of practitioners with practical experiences of related activities on the ground, and seek their cooperation and establish links with the scientific community. This line of action can support significant capacity building at local, national and sub-regional level. The major challenges and issues are well presented in the Blueprint and are reflected in the IOC Medium Term Strategy 20142021. Uniqueness of the IOC The unique role of the IOC is being the intergovernmental ocean science organization focusing on coordination, dissemination of scientific ocean data which can underpin marine science policy, including for Tsunami Warning Systems, for advocacy on protecting `The Area` of UNCLOS, for promoting multidisciplinary science and consistent methodologies, for training and capacity building, and for data and information sharing (UK 2015), and support sustainable development and achievement of blue-green economy. Sustained Ocean Observations and Services fit these points, which may also define the identity and sustain the cohesiveness of the IOC. The links to economy and need to demonstrate economic benefits and returns are also clear. Some conclusions Major issues and challenges are well identified. There is a unique role of the IOC as the ocean science organization includes facilitating data collection, storage and exchange, scientific basis for coastal and ocean management and warning systems for hazards generated at sea. Related activities provide for opportunities to demonstrate the usefulness of the scientific knowledge and socio-economic returns. Three strategic areas emerge: improve the understanding among policy and decision makers at high level of the critical importance of ocean and data for development of most countries, including sustainability; explain the link in a clear and understandable way between the science and its role in helping addressing the critical, current issues of society, which includes coastal deteriorations and pollution, loss of ecosystem services and biodiversity, climate change, open ocean genetics; strengthen capacity development through regional cooperation, teaching ocean importance and need for understanding, with demonstration of economic and social impacts; enhance participation of Member States and keep abreast of technical advances. In all of these the expertise of Member States should be used. At high level the Executive Secretary and the elected officers all have the potential and authority to pursue advocacy for ocean issues, the need for a scientific basis for ocean governance and economic development, inherent in the text of UNCLOS, the requirement for ocean observations in context of forecasting and hazard warnings, involving in the advocacy process high level decision makers, public and private enterprises, and social society. Priority activities to address the primary needs of Member States need be connected to realistic budget allocations and expected results. Some of these may be pursued in cooperation with other UNESCO activities, in this way strengthening the IOC function in UNESCO. So the group suggests maintaining the Future of the IOC on the agenda of assemblies and executive councils in the future. It also calls for strengthening the intersessional work entrusting the IOC Officers as the elected representatives of the "owners" of the organization, to take action exploiting emerging opportunities in the intersessional period supported by the Executive Secretary. In pursuing these points, the IOC officers could consider to prepare a concise presentation of the historical evolution of the IOC in the changing conditions since its inception, together with elucidating how it works, functions, in what context and its role as an intergovernmental mechanism. Proposed decision Following the decision of the IOC Executive Council at its 48th session on 16 June 2015 to establish a sessional working group on the Future of the IOC during the assembly, the group agreed that it would be appropriate that a common message from IOC to UNESCO and other UN organizations, should be drafted by the sessional group for consideration by the assembly at its agenda item 4. This message should aim to explain the societal benefits of the mission, programmes and activities of the IOC as a functionally autonomous body designed to provide an efficient platform for coordination, information and sharing of knowledge to contribute to sustainable and peaceful development.     page PAGE 8 IOC-XXVIII/ page PAGE 7 Restricted Distribution IOC-XXVIII/2 Annex 4 Paris, 17 June 2015 Original: English INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO) Twenty-eighth Session of the Assembly UNESCO, Paris, 1825 June 2015 Item 4 of the Provisional Agenda Report of the Chair of the Intersessional Working Group on "The Future of the IOC" 89MNOfg  . / 0 1 3 Z ͹륝둥{tetF=hZhCCJOJPJQJ^JaJfHmH q sH hZhCfHq hZhCh hBhhh?~FhM[!^JaJhM[!hM[!>*^JaJh o^JaJhM[!^JaJh'yhH*^JaJ'jhghPJUnHtHhghPJnHtH!jhghPJUnHtHh^JaJhBhh>*^JaJ 0 1 2 3 [ |wobRR, & F x`gdU%m$ /^`gdU%/ & FgdgdZlkdg$$IfTlV<0244 laytU%T x$Ifgd $$Ifa$gdU% Z [  0 @ D E R T [ \ j - 2 5 7 ? A K L | ̷방e=hZhCCJOJPJQJ^JaJfHmH q sH  hZhs,UhZhC>*hZhH|H* hZhH| hZh hZh;d hZhC(hZh9NCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH =hZh9NCJOJPJQJ^JaJfHmH q sH (hZhCCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH ! - A 4{ j gdC, & F g`ggdU%, & F x^`gdU%m$, & F gx`ggdU%m$gds,U /^`gdZ, & F ^`gdU%m$ ?@JY  'vyyydOdOd(hZh;dCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH (hZhCCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH  hZhC hZhs,UhZhC>*%hZhC^JaJfHq =hZhs,UCJOJPJQJ^JaJfHmH q sH =hZhCCJOJPJQJ^JaJfHmH q sH =hZh;dCJOJPJQJ^JaJfHmH q sH '5vw\#9R vx 0x^`0gd$dh1$7$8$H$a$gd /^`gdZ gdC, & Fn^n`gdU%, & Fnx^n`gdU%m$gds,U, & F ^`gdU%m$ vw\,QYf!"#9Rc(r PkühZh>*CJ]^JaJhZhCJ]^JaJhZh5CJPJ^JaJhZhZ] hZh hZhG hZhH| hZhL hZhhZhyH* hZhy hZh;d hZhChZhC^JaJ,RrQ $ & F 7nxG$^n`a$gdU%  7x^7gd$ & F 7nxG$^`na$gdU%$ & F 7xG$^`a$gdU%  x^gd  vx^vgdB####$$%%%%&&y&z&{&&&&' '%'&'U'V'a'b'p'q'x'y'}'~''''㿸voohhh hZhvJ hZhpOhZhpO0J*>*hZh0J*>*jhZh9NU hZh9NjhZh9NU hZh hZh}w hZhy hZhhZhCJ^JaJhZh>*CJ]^JaJhZhCJ]^JaJhZhZCJ]^JaJ& !W""#$%%'''+-000:2d44L9l9gdZ /^`gdZgd x 7^7`gd x 7x^7`gd$ & F 7nxG$^n`a$gdU%'''b(y(V)W)))))<-W-------. .).*......00*0600011d4488L9M9l9::?5?@AAArAǨ١ࡗhZhvJ5\ h o5\h*M hZh5\ hZhhZhAZ0J*>*jhZhZU hZhZjhZhZU hZh hZh\ hZhvJ hZh0DhZ hZh hZhAZ3l9>@AZCEEIIkNNRS\VVZZ]]<_Z_ `a & F gdU%/x^`gdZ /^`gd*M gdZ /^`gdZrAsA+C2Cjjjjjjjjjjjjk k k kk k!kLkXkYknkvk~kkʿmaSJaJah[5CJ^Jha5h[5CJ\^Jh h[5CJ^J"jh[U^JaJmHnHuh[^JaJhs,U^JaJhLT^h[5^JaJhs,U5CJ$^JaJ$h[5CJ$^JaJ$h\nh[5CJ$^JaJ$hLT^h[^JaJh[h1;h[^JaJmH sH !h o0J^JaJmHnHsH u!jhMBh[0JU^JaJjj kkk kLkXkYkksW # `0pEP ^ gdP9/ & `0p@ P ^ gdP9/  `0pP ^ gdP9/$ & `0p@ Pa$gdP9/"$ 2`0p@  Pla$gds,U $ 7 a$gds,U   gds,U kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkklllll lǿǴǁyrnjc hZhhU%h[ hh[hs,UmHsHhCh[mHsHh#h[>*CJ^Jhs,UCJ^Jh[5CJ^Jh#h[CJ^Jh?Ah[CJ^Jh[^JaJhLT^h[^JaJhLT^h[\^JaJh h[5CJ^Jh[CJ\^Jh h[CJ\^Jkkkkkkkkkkkkllll l /^`gdZgdP9/ gds,UgdP9/ D%gdP9/$a$gdP9/ `0pP ^ gdP9/ # `0p@ P ^ gdP9/I 0 00P&P 1h:p!iU. A!n"n#$n% Dpn/'  ƹdPNG  IHDRqW pHYs.#.#x?vgAMAOX2tEXtSoftwareAdobe ImageReadyqe</QIDATxb`` &=(4F(<CG(T4` ELZ)Q0 h`A0 Fu@Q0 g s"{ Q0 hQ0*@Т@?`(`Q0@Q0 F(#(`Q0@1(6k@GcE` .0ughQ@}@h0OxaѠ F7Q0xqѠ F+Q0 u˃Ѡ F(73y(8` 0r >8$`Ph7 F(|/O$Ȱ ~8@V~`Q@[` UlPxq4* F+Q0 F( [;@;J WώOЁ@#zH F+Q0 F(gT=@alj#P/T n#g@( (T8. A ^ACŏ Ѹ  Ft;@.2Xz<πy`4@q˻|C/g?Sq Y F$:P:#ѡ?G ǑF`$8+ô~S+@>IQ硅hp[P#G@gcqπR4hZՒ(,t 6ď6cICQDLDK<:O8@?Z܎7 l7t 0t%@2@D>׏ ^~*Oz/'==zKoo |/pЬ1wʀ^yz_َҷm-V؞G+lGvnCF#"E W^ZRo[؎{hi{ z $ C*@Ww,EM*Qj/5B0$Gi٠v&(F+@*@ٝg\wb 9ÐAC 9Q0+C5#MԮI>= Cc?' V0z'v0eE0To3@'FPt: IC rEO#F+@XZbk8Ѻ7FNbx|3nU6~P3F92Im@3?I=10DH.}F\VNS@U~\D2Iڽ1rVRR!n`hwʡDʏhagR5R{ؤVȣ薆Q穙֕`(lG}#$&V~C5a` s+?Rhat8muh7}.7g@1R&ILT @|q4} H4yx"g⇣Q2$њeX2 0Q4 FHPvOSE?Ll~4<:z#4F(<y y8x$f;+;>p@Q0 Ǜ3 t P>>OA/$m@h_ OHD_bGGzyI ւP(]` @q]~4 EN C8(ȋ}@B*4Rpʞąj ZXG(7fЖ~h7 6y6#ϓd&z @V~x=7 x2 od}#*Dh` R@!nRnbH0e;oQ0>&@|p@>Q¯ 4ZQ0 '@JA5*`GR{4ZQ0 F{} > ڤ,p0zmT ,}Xn: F`(Hza0L+^&؀ ğUYGhXz8 F( vZ6N@>t ~8'f&JCi8V~=4 F( h 0TDH? @zs@1Q=Pu!r$ 8 .BOqj@El@׽(@ 校4Ȑ `+`(صHviy8 ߜ/(*X+he( S_U[Ofoʷ]ru{<jSπVvXvlM<($b/ h7t*?"F vjG?ZȞK=Fu[4Z >PZ)3($5R~|èC3RΞat*ba@G(lŠ4K*H@GR2%`˷R;qQra0 pJ_ROj哅A3l&@DPeM@V~\ #bAA.Ux4H@*Fi@e!۵"C5nFgd4^k XFgȂ`χaQ@[TUj wQ ^h7 F(GQ#40Z`W2 @#lOѴ0 FT~^3 F*?l 1=z`^(@)T~4ZQ0hY(~0;hQ@OpJ;0 1Xn3`/iU$PO { X$@`4-A Yua}C @R6 P@ f85?@ht(`f`Ѩ0n 9k] ; c0 @(,`6[[-tl=ROSxg8n96H``pBl(U9`)tFBwZZ(@6+l 1u İz0r\D?8nhtsQ@˞߁W{hO yTCaE;0 *%^&UvbT'2@?T?LO=Z}w`a@#`=7rZy|8PZEЀ f @/tyNR2 UĔN`@,?\H;0 F(P@kmGπzhi#JR#JȬ` *0 \Vj=ЅP\U'@[T`=SU` Pӳ2|>hQ0 F{-vUd70v1^ lV 3@s miU = 3`?-^ @]8 P1ty`KZh Pm r 9LV4i>PC6p*P1Chޛ0bv XТф<-@#Sn>#рp!Q0 ѳ@Pyph#u ʙ Y9W\*HT6OPL0 Þ CpG@34pb9P뇪S@?qaŧeGS68@գ~w/N`@lǠ4)@s~C\Ѻ$`WP;q8xh#uyĂP!z{ 4R` , PWp`@YRcO"a@ЭFda6Zq`U|^=TyĞ8]4B<1^HbŁmi*hr1p(L W?W]D >Jh7[ѣ"ۢ ?\*x0h9^^d j,o耇Xz2@")j@4x<[ Bj? #2 Fj0Lz 7׆!``C"*vW X\ hڕho HeCJ WHO{qd,  {!aO{4LpzF(L2MT@ehƃAn=+d+y/4ZѶ1\0:7 FrWRKdaq<1S '0 . P?ѳ=ݽg~` ,pTFȽBZrnw@?s & Xe 6dT_(`@v0a}A 0X @#76ܐ0 F( #ƠB}>;og@uHFA($@GD1ڏ|dlOE``=uF=げP%;!o:ju{y$T9lf0YU5=z|C'!RO;~hT~ìb_< o cd?`?D*?y$w9>T>i(oY'³B +||"*BzT` @s~C"6s뫨p400?/H k.>~C+ 9?J@Q"pԽ lAh$muN h|5j@!c]  DVwC{>C˻ /F2Aqs| vyꭗ@4* ?$(}Q0Hiv? kpTfDh`z(X6CeJ ? Nht%>ч͡<"08Nfi@ o!#lJK  MDkRTf0 ;6G+0`Υ ļ`=c`qT TўG+Q0`b@ak@"ϑ!˜zh4EÆ aJjzqc;v 4*O G)A="lOjaC~HC?BË^W7X Q02{~m=6A~T9"`P]͋kqP)@? C?]XF( ya+}*}+ho`7;(V&bA 4 @#7o=Rw```r'?@p E,^w0`^φܳQ>[@OAhhy,-Pdב3 -zI vX<@,~0nSX@Z9qpD~F6cHf>hU~朘8 Z/=0ZQG C0B Ghz sZ8z; _4P!.P(@aGYKFhںHFhU~F( Gл6"1XHbfO>;AT~i~@W F(\=|\P[+Y PRZ!$xh@!Od# Z@. 0q = F`5 Ѽ+@s5M;K~ Tc DrC""@DPq[l3h*{-p6ht(,`@: }- ]SZ̢uϷvutw80 ncv%l@D凬vNp" % FZw`||f }p e%'@J^h^C+ wy40 <;@^ l!FXF$h7 F4 BZ,bO'AiZ?jH=3lC߰^ꜙ |ԍ =Ai[?``гc@j.0X@94OU-@LîJ`ϩFh Bqr +hâanR`}]j,HLz/#MH=d` Z 7J5LIXjpy,y1Oi%klDKG(hJQ0 F-"{X0=A==lOC{ \ ŭX6?@t Fbw`<`PU~ 4`Q҃wa2 aO "W@=Q0 Fh击\rVh )|KhҪ4`@ [wh$V~F(PЦg0?Gy ;S=@Xg`0P!Z Z?T ߧAwG[-:ݧFgvL 0Je6F@#qh7 swt`s(V~IF\vⴁuq ~@. zڣG SZ/y 4ư2@ots VZ`C @ U^Fd@GIJh/P)J@ߐ19}C^V3TkqKdz"a?|\Uw쇚cVvb9B:8@Sׅ/11 Ddl2-IɮQ0xhCV[*T 5(3(ȭr{TҲ o@ժO<+?B=eFyqD^?a̸=OaOD59{UvTL#{}4 ^@Жb<twV}1 `QO-h `7 #aSknd!6BO`@][qV``5h,y?ʨ 9n\wC09't9ۀ(` '0{<=1j`=dG(Pߓ4@Q0 F@?riX '̕1n[π:WObH64hQ0 GLO XET Dʏ^?}2R<9>֜(F(`? e$_bnD;!e@ d|2Pd O :40^WkEh8?D7) V#@bcģCC $u> ԣ%z ,\JQحv ƞ~2e>=KtsFh7@=Z?+?{4Z3 q!S7X+DClg >W F+QBL F+QчIDn>pG#@Rk4<^0lQ@)xm z Hݫvq4JP 0;x  wN!nP:PgeNz KU@ +F(ƶT| ͞3237C{3Pp8'#o3KTh7Gh7|R*$lq#vanS.]@hth7Gh7JPR [*U lǨ[}̕w @(ţph)W #>e F(F0(Hl%d@3D؉1i' 3}a>hţx )T 5G\Jn#v)E4^Ks@[F(n(0 hKZ\'A" (; oO 74e-# hQ0 Fg~*)=\k^m?&?,@Joq@1Q0 FОJC"͉ ;N*ڹ+>Hz{h8!ԌơhQ0 F2ы"XZ5G$e*Ky[4F(Ra3~ a+MIr$g>H2Q4 F(+APOJL!chݻq|@Q0 ?a9\׉( 9|PPs;<M7ާ<{Of`P]2 FrѠ8-I`d` ~ JfAK.@ P;A~4"2eXmQ4 Fn}pcZj ;tئ=E` 0z *Bg*D +BǞ @Þ` *FO=BХ ށ@i˃aÕH #dF(\S(@(,G}@> DsTitre 4$$@&5\R@R DsTitre 5#$$ 7n@&^n`5\R@R DsTitre 6$$ 7n@&^7 5]aJ:@: DsTitre 7$dh@&>*^ @^ (Y.Titre 9 <@&'56>*CJPJ\]^JaJnHtH:A`: Police par dfautVi@V Tableau Normal4 l4a 2k`2 Aucune liste *O* &DsMarge`.O. $DsPar `7a$:O: Ds(a)^7`a$2O"2 Ds(b) 7n^n>O2> Ds(c) 7^`a$:OB: DsalinaG$^7a$hJ&`QJ DsAppel note de bas de p.H*6@b6 DsEn-tte 9r R@rR DsNote de bas de page ^7`CJaJ@ @@ Ds Pied de page 9r 4)@4 DsNumro de pagefof Ds TIRET bul 1cm2$ & F 7SSH$^S`a$HOH DsSerre7*$@&G$a$ aJhtH 8O8 's,UCOI 7xPJaJ`T@` Ds Normal centr7G$]^ha$6]hmH sH P@ DsCorps de texte 2"dhdd7G$[$\$$B*PJ^JhmH nHphsH tHC@ # Retrait corps de texte,Quotation$xd7G$\$]n^na$6hNOaN  Doc. heading a$5;CJ\^JlN@l #Retrait corps et 1re lig.!x7G$^`a$hDoQ"D  List numbered"$ & Fa$(o!2( KkStyle1#LoAL iPar Char#CJOJQJ_HaJhmH sH tH F6`RF KkListe puces 2 % & FPoaP i Marge Char#CJOJQJ_HaJhmH sH tH LoqL s,UCOI Char#CJOJPJQJaJhmH sH tH lol  Y. Titre 9 Car>56>*CJOJPJQJ\]^J_HaJhmH nHsH tHXoX Y. Titre 9 Car1'CJOJPJQJ^JaJhmH sH tH BU`B ^cLien hypertexte >*B*ph\V`\ +Lien hypertexte suivi visit >*B*ph@ C Liste couleur - Accent 1, 7G$^m$CJOJPJQJ^JhmHsHN@N .Texte de bulles-CJOJQJ^JaJ^o^ -Texte de bulles CarCJOJQJ^JaJhmH sH o 09Nparagraph numerote>/$ & F 7 -D3$5$9DG$M a$^JaJo /9Nparagraph numerote Char Char4CJOJQJ^JaJfHhmH q sH tH PK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭V,cy$gc.bAn̖kեC A0vs<>6r=*%@&ٖ6دk.~8$ 6./lS _//"JFV!zn^3ੵ,_wr%8/[k.$eVi2[Psjcs7f WKՆ7dg ȘJj|j(KD- dXiJ؇2x$( :'vɗsKZj{Zb&^>{?=уG]8 ˻^|ɟ>D<Ϫ~j ̜?_|+!D7!18fZNFl;I(q =9S̲8vt xur1xEu5$ IA.N&)f^݈8f2((}B*C .X;u0 ɐjmڦ1eZ3ۉm-r"+00~Hƫxp\%rcVu*#Sq= !a"e՞-%ƪL.R(_%:漌iv@}OCbU|Cp0ݷ)q}2ܢcҬ@ULC5@W4;fj8?| Tބӫg"qzr7$%G[r~KS򌅁,bm3v 1el\fp}X̕4A 6{ASLt(Q%\rl_٫fS_B,sHvx`Wr~(BshUr) 64Cebs)bMjBUkp:6GyZL3E2rQ$)9G񄨕v$5˳:Y+x%vYRnNöj.7= .Yo|%lٟ̦gl厹MPW6s;< liGY Dk/7!@Ί5( Z2_]Zѱ_3*E шMR*uahG.9gMW~#fpv4; !6o%JۍsgwŴ9R.+<+΀FS*BiDpT ߅PT/ȁa.jHP8T$Z2wzvvY,d*dL#r@Ps>=A6hן=Qr9LV638h&T-;ƬFtExZƚxY(wHH>vu[xA@U_iG08E[LZ m6:9Oc֖&g v1^<`gvbm2{Eai_dLbd_.$z ~30%M1T =0}o5PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ttheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] dd ;;;Z v'rAeijk l79;=?ACEFH R l9ajk l8:<>@BDGI8Nfz)&&& dXXX.57!!t ,b$'  ƹd/K@ (    nA? "notext-bwImage 9notext-bw#" ?0(  B S  ?! nT@ _Hlt398741343a!d@b!dES i w .<ftao "*"1%;%M1R12;7;?;F;]]q^^bbbbbbbbbd!d jVqVYYbbbbbbbbbbbbMcOcd!d33333333A "%'*(6(0M1F236O8 ;<=l>BCRR___bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb cd!d H~"c %%6lPIBcr/T(/L.M3EtC 2*PKuit \k<^`^殅)x:^`:o(() SS^S`OJQJo(-^`OJ QJ ^Jo(o pp^p`OJ QJ o( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(^`OJ QJ ^Jo(o ^`OJ QJ o( ^`OJQJo(^`OJ QJ ^Jo(o PP^P`OJ QJ o( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o p^p`OJ QJ o( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o ^`OJ QJ o( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o P^P`OJ QJ o(h ^`6]o(. ^`OJ QJ o(o p^p`OJ QJ o( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o ^`OJ QJ o( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o P^P`OJ QJ o(h ^`o(hH()h ^`hH.h  L^ `LhH.h w ^w `hH.h G^G`hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH. ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o p^p`OJ QJ o( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o ^`OJ QJ o( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o P^P`OJ QJ o(#0^#`0o(()^`.[ L^[ `L.+ ^+ `.^`.L^`L.^`.k^k`.;L^;`L.^`o(.^`o(()pL^p`L.@ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PL^P`L. ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o p^p`OJ QJ o( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o ^`OJ QJ o( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJ QJ o(o P^P`OJ QJ o(8^`o(()8 ^`hH.8 pL^p`LhH.8 @ ^@ `hH.8 ^`hH.8 L^`LhH.8 ^`hH.8 ^`hH.8 PL^P`LhH. M3c 6l^`^PKt \EtC)xT(/ 9T                 xT        J6                 >$|        V" Q                " Q        @ @ @ @ed;dy *M 4 +~k\\\CM[!gd#z($7h$Z8&)e.P9/1I3%c8j8.p9@>@Ay.CD/&IH7M9NpOcTs,U!iUAZ ["`da01cj^c5!gAl o*rTrsr w}w x[y?LT{oCUZR_BfG}0Dx-]/}Zyj[HJOM4HdCvJt#2 PWU%L/O"H|{'bb@M1M1M1M1 d @Unknown g* Times New RomanTimes New Roman5SymbolS. * ArialTimes New Roman7.@CalibriI. ??Arial Unicode MSW(SimSunArial Unicode MSQ=  jMS Mincho?l?r ??fc7@Cambria[Lucida GrandeCourier NewW=  *Cx Courier NewCourier New;WingdingsA$BCambria Math!p6g،6gg&.)eS2)eS2n24\b\b C#qHX '<2   Macintosh HD:Users:a_fischer:Library:Containers:com.apple.mail:Data:Library:Mail Downloads:80F84E9A-B9E5-47D6-B029-9DB32F91FD60:Template WD-EC47.dotxThe Road to the UN YearAlbert FischerBoned, Patrice8         Oh+'0p   , 8 DPX`hThe Road to the UN YearAlbert FischerTemplate WD-EC47Boned, Patrice3Microsoft Office Word@m@f@^5@8f")eS՜.+,D՜.+,x4 hp  UNESCO2\b The Road to the UN YearThe Road to the UN Year TitreTitleH 8@ _PID_HLINKSA+Vhttp://www.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=14946"Vhttp://www.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=14021d4d4  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abdefghijlmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry Fal"Data c1TablekHWordDocument8SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjr  F Document Microsoft Word 97-2003 MSWordDocWord.Document.89q