ࡱ> '` VbjbjDD .&&N111812lel22333333%e'e'e'e'e'e'e$hhzjKe:33::Ke33`e===:33%et=:%e==5^ Yb32 `$1:U`< eve0e`l;rlxYblYb35:b=67?333KeKe=^333e::::"" MID-TERM EVALUATION OF THE GEF PROJECT ON ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONDING TO COASTLINE CHANGE IN ITS HUMAN DIMENSIONS IN WEST AFRICA THROUGH INTEGRATED COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT (ACCC) Introduction The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework is consistent with UNDP, UNESCO and GEF procedures. A first meeting was organized in Praia (28-30 November 2007). Each country as well as the regional coordination has its own monitoring framework consisting in a set of expected results and related indicators. These frameworks were discussed and completed during the regional inception meeting. A total of 10 indicators corresponding to the 4 outcomes of the project was defined (see annex A5 of the regional inception meeting report). Other aspects of the monitoring will be found in annual country reports. The monitoring framework has four objectives: i) to monitor and evaluate results and impacts; ii) to provide a basis for decision making on necessary amendments and improvements; iii) to promote accountability for resource use; and iii) to document, provide feedback on, and disseminate lessons learned. The monitoring will be applied continuously throughout the lifetime of the project e.g. periodic monitoring of indicators -, or as specific time-bound exercises such as mid-term review, audit reports and independent evaluations. As recommended during the second steering committee held in Banjul, the mid term independent evaluation is considered as an essential tool for the monitoring of the project. It was requested that this activity be coordinated and funded by the regional coordination unit based in BREDA/UNESCO. The Mid-Term Evaluation will determine progress being made towards the achievement of outcomes and will identify course correction if needed. It will focus on the effectiveness, efficiency and timeliness of project implementation; will highlight issues requiring decisions and actions; and will present initial lessons learned about project design, implementation and management. The mid-term evaluation provides the opportunity to assess early signs of project success or failure and prompt necessary adjustments. Purpose of the evaluation The purpose of the evaluation is to review the performance of the ACCC project. The review will evaluate progress in programme implementation measured against the planned outputs in the Project Document and assess the likely impacts of the project. The evaluation will recommend improvements for the project. An independent Mid-Term Evaluation will be undertaken at the end of the second year of implementation. The Mid-Term Evaluation will determine progress being made towards the achievement of outcomes and will identify course correction if needed. It will focus on the effectiveness, efficiency and timeliness of project implementation; will highlight issues requiring decisions and actions; and will present initial lessons learned about project design, implementation and management. Findings of this review will be incorporated as recommendations for enhanced implementation during the final half of the projects term. The organization, terms of reference and timing of the mid-term evaluation will be decided after consultation between the parties to the project document. The Terms of Reference for this Mid-term evaluation will be prepared by the UNDP CO based on guidance from the Regional Coordinating Unit and UNDP-GEF. Background The aim of the Adaptation to Climate Change Responding to Coastline change in its human dimensions in West Africa through Integrated Coastal Area Management (ACCC) Project is to deliver local and global benefits in the form of (i) enhanced capacity of coupled social-ecological systems to adapt to climate change, and (ii) the improved management and use of biodiversity through measures that both promote a combination of conservation and improved ecosystem resilience. A combination of adaptive capacity (AC) and biodiversity (BD) related indicators will therefore be used to assess project performance. The project addresses a single, overarching goal and objective, which are approached by pursuing a set of outcomes, which are in turn realised through a number of different activities. The overall goal of the project is to reduce vulnerability and to increase adaptive capacity to the adverse effects of climate change in the focal areas in which the GEF works. As the contribution to the goal, the Objective of the project is: to develop and pilot a range of effective coping mechanisms for reducing the impact of climate change induced coastal erosion in vulnerable regions in five countries in West Africa (Cape Verde, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Mauritania and Senegal). To achieve this four main outcomes are proposed: Implement pilot activities to increase the adaptive capacity and resilience of coastline ecosystems in regions vulnerable to climate change impacts;, Integrate climate change and adaptation issues into coastal area management policies and programmes; Enhance monitoring of coastal erosion and capacity building in coastal management and planning; Increase learning, evaluation, and adaptive management. At the national level, the two first components are considered through the following outputs: In selected sites (1 by country), demonstration pilot activities are developed to enhance the adaptive capacity of ecosystems to climate change. The sites have been identified to be vulnerable to climate change, including variability, induced coastal erosion and have a high potential to generate global environmental benefits (in the biodiversity focal area); In order to integrate climate change and adaptation issues into coastal area management policies and programmes, three types of activities are considered: the integration of these concerns across sectors; the design of national policies and programmes to facilitate adaptation to climate change in coastal regions and the replication of successful community level approaches to mitigate and adapt to coastline erosion. At this national level, a National Project Management Team (NPMT) consisting of a National Project Director (from the national lead agency), a national Project Coordinator and a financial and administrative assistant works closely with the implementing agency (UNDP country office) to implement the project. The national lead agency is responsible for effective project delivery and for the management of the national components. Of the 5 countries Guinea Bissau, which is under DEX modality, is the exception where the responsibility of the lead national agency has been given to the UNDP country office. In each country a national steering committee is set up to give advice to the project. At the regional level, the project is addressing the two last components. Specific objectives are: Regarding the third outcome, which is about monitoring of coastal erosion and capacity building in coastal management and planning to be enhanced, the following outputs are pursued: Improvement of the capacities of institutions and human resources to develop and implement adaptation strategies and measures in coastal environment; Establishment of a clearing-facility to capture, store, disseminate lessons and best practices and information products; In order to increase learning, evaluation, and adaptive management (outcome 4) the following outputs are identified: The establishment of a learning mechanism for adaptive management ; The enhancement of cooperation at the regional level in addressing climate change impacts on coastal area management. The regional components are conducted by the Regional Programme Management Unit (RPMU) based in BREDA/UNESCO office in Dakar and under the supervision of the executing partner, IOC/UNESCO. A regional steering committee is set up with annual meetings to review project progress as a whole. The project sustains capacity building efforts through knowledge management, best practices, communications and outreach. The ACCC project was launched in November 2008 in Dakar during which it was decided to implement it in three years so that the project will end in December 2011. For the year 2009, a regional steering committee was organized in Banjul in November 2009. The reports of these two meetings are available at the RPMU and on the web site. Objectives of the mid-term evaluation The evaluation should include, but not be limited to the followings: Review the relevance of project objectives. In the context of a rapidly-evolving Convention process, the mid term evaluation review will consider the relevance of the objective of the project which is: To develop and pilot a range of effective coping mechanisms for reducing the impact of climate change induced coastal erosion in vulnerable regions in five countries in West Africa (Cape Verde, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Mauritania and Senegal). Assess effectiveness in project implementation. Progress should be measured at national and regional levels against the objectives and outputs stated in the project document and the work plans, including the relevance and flexibility of the work plans, compliance with work plans, monitoring and evaluation framework, and activities completed. It will also assess whether the 4 outcomes could be achieved, the first two ones being at national level and the two last being at regional level: Outcome 1: Pilot activities to increase the adaptive capacity and resilience of coastline ecosystems in regions vulnerable to climate change impacts implemented On selected sites, based on their vulnerability to climate change, the occurrence of coastal erosion together with potentialities to develop or increase the biodiversity, pilot demonstration activities are proposed. The selection process used principles developed in the Adaptation Policy Framework and was based on large consultation processes with the main stakeholders. The following activities were identified with the view to improve the adaptive capacity of ecosystems and local communities to climate change, reduce coastal erosion and conserve the biodiversity: Mangrove restoration; Rehabilitation of indigenous vegetative cover; Stabilization of coastal dunes Development of alternative livelihoods Dissemination of new technologies to release the pressure of degradation of ecologically important resources. These activities were supposed to be accompanied by capacity building, awareness raising, training and information at the level of local communities. Outcome 2: Climate change and adaptation issues and coastal area management policies and programmes integrated The main target here is to develop the practice of integrated coastal zone management which is considered as the best way to implement adaptation options with regards to climate change impacts in the coastal zone. Another option is to integrate climate change issues into national development plans. Depending on the countries and the state of revision of their national sectoral plans, the following activities were suggested: Development and implementation of integrated coastal and watershed management plans/programmes; Formulation and implementation of zoning regulations for sea-level rise sensitive coastal settlements; Review existing national plans and policies to integrate adaptation to climate change concerns; Empowering decentralized governmental agencies and local communities to enforce laws that facilitate adaptation to climate change in coastal regions; Organization of exchanges and dialogues between policy-makers as well as communities on the impacts of climate change on coastal erosion and adaptation activities. Outcome 3: Monitoring of coastal erosion and capacity building in coastal management and planning enhanced This outcome seeks to achieve effective monitoring of coastal erosion and building capacity at the national level to implement adaptation measures. The following activities were proposed: Develop and implement national and regional training courses and other capacity building activities in Integrated Coastal Area Management and Climate Change impacts, and relevant Adaptation Techniques; Analysis of data and training in climate change science, oceanography and marine sciences to increase knowledge on reducing vulnerability to coastal erosion Establish a web-based clearing house mechanism for monitoring of erosion and lessons learned, based on the Adaptation Learning Mechanism emplaced by UNDP; Develop project information materials. Outcome 4: Learning, evaluation, and adaptive management increased Through this outcome, the programme wanted to achieve good management and coordination tools at national and regional levels in order to share the experiences in the different countries. To achieve that the following indicative activities were suggested: Establish project management mechanisms at national levels; Set up a network of stakeholders in Adaptation to Coastal Erosion; Organize periodic meetings for participating countries on training, exchanging information and views; Convene of regional forum between relevant coastal, urban planning and other policy makers in the participating countries; Establishment of an inter-regional Task Force and/or network on adaptation to climate change impacts on coastal regions; Develop cross-border adaptation initiatives through experience exchanges and development of transboundary projects and programs. For a complete view of these activities, the contractor should read the document of the project. Assess the effectiveness of institutional arrangements. The evaluation will assess the effectiveness of the institutional arrangements in implementing the programme at national and regional levels, examine their role in monitoring of the quality of the outputs generated by national teams, and provision of strategic direction. It will identify any adjustments that would be needed for a more effective implementation of the project. It will also determine whether the implementing agencies, including the UNDP country offices and regional partners, are carrying out various activities in a timely and appropriate manner. Assess the project impacts. This evaluation will examine how the project is integrated in the efforts made at national level to adapt to climate change. To the extent possible, the evaluation will assess whether the project has been able to enhance local, national and regional capacities on climate change issues. Identification of good practices. The evaluation will highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the different activities, and will focus on the process rather than the project outputs. Attention should be given to the nature and level of interaction between the programme and countries, including issues addressed, effectiveness of workshops, frequency of communications, follow-up activities as a way to potentially identify good practices to respond to countries needs. The evaluation may comment on project sustainability, strategic partnerships, and the effectiveness of the programme to manage, co-ordinate and oversee the provision of technical assistance in a cost-effective and efficient manner. Assess the project design. The evaluation will assess the project design, its relevance and budget allocation for project activities. Develop recommendations. The evaluation will not only recommend ways to improve the performance of the project to increase resilience of communities, ecosystems and institutions to the impacts of climate change in coastal regions. It will identify activities and countries/regions in need of greater attention and may consider the potential role of the project in the future, if any, in light of this experience. Some issues for consideration include: Which activities in the countries have worked and why? Which activities could be proposed at different levels? What capacities have been built in the regions or countries by the programme and how to improve the initiatives? What might be the role of implementing agencies in future? What is the need for further extension of the project either at national (other pilot sites) and/or sub regional levels (other countries)? Methodologies to be used The evaluation will be based on the following methodologies, given the fact that it will not be able to visit all the countries and partners as well as stakeholders: Desk review of relevant documentation such as the project document, national and regional work plans, workshop reports, materials developed by the project, progress reports, and the project web site. Visit to two countries (Senegal and The Gambia proposed) as well as to the RPMU (based in Dakar), the implementing agency (UNDP/GEF), regional executing agency (IOC/UNESCO by phone), and the Interim Secretariat of NEPAD for environment; Feedback from other countries through written surveys based on a questionnaire; Telephone interviews, as appropriate, combined with emails to a selected number of partners, institutions interested by the project. A final report will be produced with the suggested plan given in the annex. Timing The proposed schedule would be carried out within the following timeframe: Email consultation with the Regional Programme Management Unit (end of July 2010) Compilation and analysis of relevant documents (August 2010) Design, implementation and review of surveys, including selection of countries and strategies for interviews (August /September 2010) Visit to the countries (September 2010) First draft report and review by agencies involved (October 2010) Second draft report and review by agencies involved (mid October 2010) Final report (1st week of November 2010) Number of days required for the consultancy is a maximum of 30 days, with 15 days field visits to Dakar, Palmarin and The Gambia. Required Skills and Competencies At least 8 years experience in conducting evaluations, including in multilateral settings Sound thematic expertise in issues related to climate change Familiarity with political and development context in Africa Strong understanding of the UN system and UNDP, in particular Excellent analytical skills Ability to organize and interpret data and present findings in both oral and written form Evidence of excellent interpersonal skills Excellent writing in English and proficiency in English and French Annex I Evaluation Report: Suggested Outline Executive summary Brief description of project Context and purpose of the evaluation Main conclusions, recommendations and lessons learned Introduction Purpose of the evaluation Key issues addressed Methodology of the evaluation Structure of the evaluation The project and its development context Project start and its duration Problems that the project seeks to address Immediate and development objectives of the project Main stakeholders Results expected Main Findings Project formulation Implementation approach Country ownership/Driveness Stakeholder participation Replication of the approach Cost-effectiveness Indicators Management arrangements Implementation Financial Planning Monitoring and evaluation Execution and implementation modalities Management by the UNDP country office Coordination and operational issues Results Attainment of the objective Sustainability Contribution to upgrading skills of the national staff Co-financing and Leveraged Resources Lessons learned Best and worst practices in addressing issues relating to relevance, performance and success Conclusions and Recommendations Corrective actions for the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the project Actions to follow up or reinforce initial benefits from the project Proposals for future directions of the project Annexes TOR Itinerary List of persons interviewed Summary of field visits List of documents reviewed Questionnaire used and summary of results      FILENAME \p C:\Documents and Settings\j_barbiere\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK23\MidTermToRsACCC.doc '*  2 p V G _ m n s G H loz~ysym hUGaJ hg)aJ hy aJ h61aJhXh:XraJhU^hU^CJNHaJhU^hU^CJaJhg)CJaJh[Ih[ICJaJhUGCJaJh8CJaJh;CJaJhXh:Xr5CJaJh:XrCJaJh1CJaJh6CJaJhXh:XrCJaJ)G H morsgh)$$d%d&d'dNOPQa$gdUGgdUG $ $*$a$gdg) & Fgd'gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr $ & Fa$gd'$a$gd:Xr$a$gd:XrVVRSefghtuy&2Q@A;ȸsg[RRhE/Th eCJhU^CJaJmH sH hE/TCJaJmH sH hUGCJaJmH sH hU^hE/ThUGCJhE/ThU^CJhy CJaJmH sH hXh:XrCJaJmH sH hg)CJaJhE/TCJaJh,6CJaJhXh:XrCJaJhXhUGaJhUG6CJaJh2hUG6CJNHaJh2hUG6CJaJ hituA>?b"c"""#gd:Xr$a$gd+ $ & Fa$gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr$a$gdg) $ & Fa$gd e$a$gd e & Fgd'gd:XrAL=>?FV-8ɶɐvnc[c[cnLh~h:XrCJaJmH sH hUGCJaJh~h~CJaJh~CJaJh eh eCJaJh eh eCJaJmH sH h eCJaJmH sH h&'CJaJmH nH uh eCJaJmH nH u%hXh:Xr6CJ]aJmH nH uhXh:XrCJaJmH nH uhE/ThUGCJ\aJhE/ThUGCJhE/Th eCJhE/ThU^CJuvEX ;实~qqdqdWJhy CJaJhmH sH hUGCJaJhmH sH h CJaJhmH sH h,6CJaJhmH sH %hXh:Xr6CJ]aJhmH sH hE/TCJaJhmH sH hXhE/TCJaJhmH sH hXh:XrCJaJhmH sH h~h:XrCJaJmH sH h~h~CJ]aJh CJaJmH sH hXh:XrCJaJmH sH h~CJaJmH sH  !W!m!n!{!!!!!!!! " "Y"`"a"b"c"j"x"~"""""ŵ}qaqUqIqh+CJaJmH sH hE/TCJaJmH sH h h 6CJaJmH sH h CJaJmH sH hXh:XrCJaJhR?h:XrCJaJhmH sH hy CJaJhmH sH hR?hR?CJaJhmH sH hR?h,6CJaJhmH sH h,6CJaJhmH sH hCJaJhhCJaJhUGCJaJhmH sH hCJaJhmH sH """"""[#p#q#~#####$$$)$n$$$$$$$$%ɁvmdXOFmhE/TCJ\aJhg.8CJ\aJh+h+CJ\aJh+CJ\aJh&'CJ\aJh+h+CJaJh:XrCJaJmH sH h+h+CJ]aJh+CJ]aJh+h+CJaJmH sH h+CJaJhE/TCJaJh&'CJaJhXh:XrCJaJmH sH hXh:XrCJaJhmH sH h CJaJmH sH h&'CJaJmH sH #$$%H%%%&&]'^'(((()  !gd:Xr & Fgd'gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr$a$gd,6 $ a$gdg.8$ ^a$gdg.8$ & F h,,^,a$gdg.8$ & F a$gd:Xr$ & F h,,^,a$gd+%%E%F%G%H%[%\%%%%% &&&;&A&J&V&]&g&n&o&{&&&&&&&&&&&['\']'혫zzkhXh,6CJaJmH sH hXh:XrCJaJhXhE/TCJaJhE/TCJaJhXhg.8CJaJhR?CJaJhy CJaJh,6CJaJh;PCJaJhg.8hg.8CJ]aJhg.8CJ]aJhg.8CJ\aJh+h+CJ\aJhg.8CJaJhg.8hg.8CJaJ$]'^'b'g'o''''''(((((((()))3)6):);)G)H)~)))))攆{ssg[hh6CJaJhXh:Xr6CJaJhCJaJhE/T56CJaJhXhE/T56CJaJhXh:Xr56CJaJh'CJaJhXh:Xr5CJaJh;Ph:Xr5CJaJmH sH hE/TCJaJh;PCJaJhy CJaJhg.8CJaJhXh:XrCJaJhXh:XrCJaJmH sH ))))**,,g-h-////0.0 & F 88^8gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr$a$gd5gd:XrL]Lgd:Xr$ & F !a$gd$ !h`ha$gd $ !a$gd  !gd:Xr))******** + +&+F++++++,,R,T,U,[,],e,n,,,,,,,˽ːːːˈːːˀːxm_hXh:Xr6CJ\aJhf6CJ\aJhDCJaJh&'CJaJh89CJaJhfCJaJhXh:Xr5CJaJhE/T56CJaJhXhE/T56CJaJhXh:Xr56CJaJhXh:XrCJaJhh:XrCJaJhCJaJhh6CJaJhhCJaJ!,,f-g-h-.>...../C/Y/d////////00-0.00¶¶ڶvk]OODh@h@CJaJhXh:XrCJ\]aJh5h5CJ\]aJh5h5CJaJh:XrCJ\]aJh5CJ\]aJhXh:XrCJ\aJh5h:XrCJaJmH sH h5h5CJaJmH sH h5CJaJmH sH h&'CJaJmH sH hfCJaJmH sH hXh:XrCJaJmH sH hfhf6]hXh:Xr6CJaJ00000314151;1?1111x2z2*3;3O3Q333444v4w4x4ynfnfXnfJhXh@CJ\]aJh@h@CJ\]aJhDCJaJh@h@CJaJhXh:Xr5CJ\aJhXh:XrCJaJhXh:Xr6CJ\aJhfhf56hfhf6hfhf6CJ\aJhfh:Xr6CJ\aJ h@h@56CJ\]aJh&'CJaJ h@h:Xr56CJ\]aJh@CJaJ.00314111P3Q334y4555t$ !^a$gdD$ & F !,,^,a$gd@ & F 88^8gd:Xr & F 88^8gd@ $ & Fa$gd@$a$gd:Xr $ !a$gd:Xr$a$gdf  !gd@ & F !,,^,gd@ x4y4 555555555566 666677C8D8Q8888 9⻭~seZOGOGh,CJaJh,hDCJaJh,h,CJaJhDhDCJ\]aJhDh:XrCJaJhXh:Xr5CJ\aJhfhf6hf6CJ\aJhXh:Xr6CJ\aJhDhD5CJ\aJhDh@5CJ\aJhDhDCJaJh@h:Xr5CJ\aJhDCJaJh@h@CJaJh@CJ\]aJ56 667D88 9 9N9O9N:::4;;*<< $ & Fa$gd,$ & F7$8$H$a$gd,gd:Xr$ & F ,87$8$H$^8a$gdD$ & F 88^8a$gdD $ & Fa$gdD$a$gdD $ !a$gd:Xr 9 9 99M9N9O9N:::3;4;:;;;;;'<(<<<<< ===F={==ź{p_QFhXh:XrCJaJhXh:Xr56CJaJ hXh:Xr56CJ\]aJhDhDCJaJhDhDCJ\aJh,h,CJ\aJh,h,CJaJ h,h,h,h,CJaJh,CJ\aJhD6CJ\aJhf6CJ\aJhfhf6CJ\aJhfhf6CJaJh:XrCJaJh,h,CJ\]aJ<<==~??@@CDDEE:FFFrGsGGG4H5H$a$gdHj  & F !gd'$ & F **>^*`>a$gdR? $ !a$gdR?  !gd:Xrgd:Xr======1>S>>>??????????@U@W@_@p@x@@@@@@@@@'A4ABBCCDDDVDmDuDDgEjEǹǗNjhXhu2CJaJhXh:Xr6CJaJhXh:Xr5CJaJhXhE/TCJaJhE/T56CJaJhXhE/T56CJaJhXh:Xr56CJaJhE/TCJaJh:XrCJaJhXh:XrCJaJhR?CJaJh,CJaJ0jEnEoEEEEEF9F}FFFFFGGpGqGrGsG}GGGG1H5H;HgHjHnHoHyHHHHHHHHHHHMI^IcIIIIIIIJ J9Jҿ⳪ҚҏҏҢh89CJaJhHjhHjCJaJhkQCJaJh'CJaJh'5CJaJhXh:Xr5CJaJhXhR?CJaJh:XrCJaJhHjCJaJhR?CJaJhXh:XrCJaJhXhu2CJaJhu2CJaJ55HHI;JJ KKKKaKbKKKLLL?MoMpMM  & F !gd[m  & F !gd:Xr  !gd:Xr$ & F !a$gd' $ !a$gdkQ$ & F !a$gdkQ $ & Fa$gdHj9J:JJJJJJJKKKbKKKKKKKKeLgLoLzL|L~LLLLLLLLLLLLLL M,M-M1M5M;M=M?MSMTMUMWMhMkMmM퐘현h[mh[mCJH*aJh1CJaJh[mCJaJh[mhHjCJaJhXhHjCJaJh:XrCJaJh'CJaJhkQh:XrCJaJhkQh:Xr5CJaJhkQCJaJhu2CJaJhXh:XrCJaJhHjCJaJ4mMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNPPPP7P@PAPSPhPkPoPPPBQiQjQmQrQQͶug\uug\hu25>*CJaJhXhu25>*CJaJhXh:Xr>*CJaJhXh:Xr5>*CJaJh:Xr>*CJ\aJhXh:Xr>*CJ\aJhXh:Xr5CJ\aJh'h'CJaJh'h'5CJaJh'CJaJh:XrCJaJh[mCJaJhu2CJaJhkQCJaJhXh:XrCJaJ$MMNnNNN)OEOOOPPPP@PAPSPpPP $ & Fa$gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr  & F !gd' & Fhd^h`gd' & Fhd^h`gd'm$gd'm$  !gd:XrPPPPQ&QBQjQQQQQ R RR0RIRfRgd:Xr$ & F h88^8a$gd:Xr $ & F a$gd:Xr$a$gd:Xr $ ^ a$gdu2 $ & Fa$gd:Xr $ & Fa$gd:Xr$ ^ `a$gd:Xr $ & Fa$gd:XrQQQQQQQQQ R R RRRR#R0RIRfRRRRSSSSSTTTٟ{ocZOhXh$JCJaJh$J5CJaJhXh$J5CJaJh[m5>*CJ\aJhXh:Xr5CJ\aJhkQ5>*CJ\aJhXh:Xr>*aJhXh:Xr5>*CJ\aJhXh:Xr>*CJaJhu2>*CJaJh:Xr5>*CJaJhkQ5>*CJaJhXh:Xr5>*CJaJhu25>*CJaJhXhu25>*CJaJfRRRRRRRRS:S`SSSSSSS$ ^a$gd:Xr$ & F h88^8a$gd:Xr $ & F a$gd:Xr$ & F h8d8^8a$gd:Xr $ & F a$gd:Xr$ & F h88^8a$gd:XrSTT%TTTTTCUtUuU}UUUUUU $ & Fa$gd:Xr$ ^ `a$gd:Xr $ ^ a$gdkQ $ & Fa$gd:Xr$n^n`a$gd:Xr $ ^ a$gd$J $ & Fa$gd$J$^`a$gd$J  !gd$JT%TTTTTTTTT;U>UBUcUjUsUtUuU}UVVVV V V V VVVVVŷzŷnjb^b^b^b^NjhiiCJOJQJUhh0jh0Uhz^hXh:Xr5CJaJhXhkQ5>*CJaJh:Xr5>*CJaJh[m5>*CJaJhu25>*CJaJhXhu25>*CJaJhXh:Xr5>*CJaJhXh:Xr>*CJaJhu2>*CJaJh$J5>*CJaJhXh$J5>*CJaJhXh$J>*CJaJUVVVV V V VVVVVVVVV  !gd:Xr $ & Fa$gd:XrV V!VVVVVVVhz^h0hiihiiCJOJQJ h6CJOJQJhmHnHujhiiCJOJQJUhhiiCJOJQJh,&P/ =!l"4#$% 8@8 :XrNormal_HmH sH tH 8@8 :Xr Heading 1$@&5DAD Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No List 4@4 :XrHeader  !4 @4 :XrFooter  !B@B :Xr Footnote Text1$mH sH @&!@ :XrFootnote ReferenceH*2B@22 :Xr Body TextCJBP@BB :Xr Body Text 2  $ *$CJLORL:Xr Memo heading_HmHnHsH tH u@J@b@ :XrSubtitle$a$5>*CJtH \6@r\ :Xr List Bullet 2 & F 8^8>*CJ\aJmH sH TOT [IPar$ 77G$`7a$CJaJhmH sH HH 6 Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJB'B y Comment ReferenceCJaJ44 y Comment Text@j@ y Comment Subject5\NGHmors g h i t u A>?bcH]^ !!!!""$$g%h%''''(.((3)4)))P+Q++,y,---. ../D00 1 1N1O1N222433*44455~7788;<<==:>>>r?s???4@5@@A;BB CCCCaCbCCCDDD?EoEpEEEFnFFF)GEGGGHHHH@HAHSHpHHHHHI&IBIjIIIII J JJ0JIJfJJJJJJJJK:K`KKKKKKKLL%LLLLLCMtMuM}MMMMMMNNNN N N NNNNNNNN00 00000000 00s0s0s0s0s0s 00i 0i  0i  0i  0i  0i 0i 0i 0i  0i  0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0i  0i  0i  0i  0i  0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0i  0i  0i  0i  0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0i  0i  0i  0i  0i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0i  0 i  0 i  0 i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0i  0i  0i  0i  0i  0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i  0 i  0 i  0i  0i 0i  0i 0i 0i 0i  0i  0i  0i  0i 0i 0i  0i 0 0 0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 0 00 0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0  0 0  0  0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0  0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0  0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 00 0  0  0  0  0  0  0 0 0@000@000@000@000@0@000GHmors g h i t u >?bcH]^ !!!!""$*44455~7788;<<==:>>>r?s???4@5@@A;BBDD?EoEpEEH@HAHSHpHI&IBIjIIIII J JJ0JJJJ:K`KKLL%LLLLLCMtMN 00 00000000 00~0~0~0~0~0~ 0h00j0000 <0000j00Ēh00h000h00j00h00j000 0j000"0h00j00h000h00j00h0 00h00j000-0.0-00-0 h0$0h0$0j0$0h0$00Ih00j00070 8070 070h0*0h0*0j0*0h0*0j0*00?0 0?0h0*0h0*0j0*00D0 E0D0 0D0h0*0j0*00I0JH0I0h0*0h0*0h0*00Yj000 00R0S0R00R000 00X0Y0X00X0 0X0 0X0 0]0 ^D0X0 0X0 0X00X00X00X00X00X00X00X0 00ij|0i0i 0i j|0i 0i 0r sx0r 0i00i00i00 0 0 0 00  "%]'),0x4 9=jE9JmMQTVV,/1234679:;=?ABDEHKMh#).05<5HMPfRSUV-058<>@CFGIJLV. 8@0(  B S  ?̮dYͮ4܏ήϮ ЮѮ4Ү츘Ӯ =Ԯ|ծd֮s׮ خLٮڮ처ۮܮ ݮTޮD+!߮7ழ|᮴3⮴\3㮴|䮴\宴lv殴箴p 讴t鮴9ꮴtSS=Ioo66p B B """""""AXAXAAEEFN     XXGOvv;;s H H """""""A]A]AAEEFN >*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonName9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplaceB*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region8*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCityC*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsmetricconverter c2008 in2009, a ProductID]^^_lv++44EE[JdJNNNNN N N N NNNNNNNN 1 ct()558899NNNNN N N N NNNNNNNN3333333si u y'''.(0 1 2N2s??CCEFFF)GEGGGAHpHHBII J JJJ:K`KKL%LLLuMMNNNNN N N N NNNNNNNNNNNN N N N NNNNNNNN9 6d$e!2 sDL#N$06S6Ĺ{|  $"2!P'r B   &' ** b?[8 9B |B /bGfSK )HSfRL\i<;m^ K_R8r:By`x2ya06S +d k~g8fFGg +d}s || h,,^,`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHhl^l`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh<^<`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH h^h`OJQJo(80^8`0o(. ^`hH. pL^p`LhH. @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PL^P`LhH.hh^h`o(-+Ih^`56789;<>*B*CJH*OJQJS*TXY(o(phhH. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH. hh^h`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o pp^p`OJQJo( @ @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o PP^P`OJQJo(h^`o(.hhhhhhhh^`OJQJo(hH h^h`OJQJo(^`o()^`o(.$ $ ^$ `o()@ @ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PLP^P`L. h^h`OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo(&**^*`B*OJPJQJ^Jo(phhHh^`OJQJo(hH pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH. h^h`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hIh^`56789;<>*B*CJH*OJQJS*TXY(o(phhH ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH. h^h`OJQJo(hh^h`o(-h,,^,`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHhl^l`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh<^<`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhh^h`o(- h^h`OJQJo(h,,^,`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHhl^l`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh<^<`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH hh^h`OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo( hh^h`OJQJo( B {||| $Gg9Bb?[8SK &'K_+d}s$ +d2ya|B!2;m^6)HSL\**6d:By`P'k~g/bGsD         Y~[        j)@S        KPɌ_T |3`nLI                                             +8+X%0Lams3 z ~mvAE;-$:>]6iM(2v en!"v'P_)--C-H-{8/3161+a2u2_3!4?5BU5Ty7g.8GY889V1:R?R @y AAEpsE"GUGI[I$J'KsnN;PIQkQE/TFTfUV?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQRSTUVXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F`$Data O1TableWlWordDocument.SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q